User talk:JuigiKario

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello JuigiKario, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Y0u (Y0ur talk page) (Y0ur contributions) 20:05, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Famicom Wars-related business

I merged Famicom Wars and Super Famicom Wars just for greater context on both, while they still don't have very much content. Feel free to split them again when they're expanded, of course. Likewise, be a bit more careful about reverting; you destroyed all of my cleanup in the Famicom Wars article in addition to undoing the merge. I'm gonna revert Famicom Wars because of this; if nothing else, it should mention Super Famicom Wars in this way even if that article isn't just a redirect to FW.

Right now, Super Famicom Wars doesn't really stand on its own as an article; maybe you could fill in a little context/info? (I've honestly never played it.) If you want to do that, I'll make sure it gets into the right categories and such.

Hey, I was talking to A Link to the Past about something related to this: as far as I can tell, "Nintendo Wars" is a fan name for the series begun by Famicom Wars, and as such probably shouldn't be the term used on the English Wikipedia to refer to the series. Do you favor using "Famicom Wars" or "Advance Wars" to refer to the series as a whole, including the Japanese names? Famicom Wars is the name Nintendo has been using for the series since 1988 (and has used as recently as this year, with "Famicom Wars DS"), but Advance Wars is the name for all three of the English-language releases (and this is the English-language Wikipedia, after all). We need to change the references to "Nintendo Wars"...what do you think they should be changed to?

While I'm thinking about it, if you're making a change that is going to be disputed (particularly in the case of reverts), please don't attempt to carry on a conversation in the edit summaries, as this tends to beggar edit/revert wars (which aren't kosher). If your reasoning is going to be disputed or requires lengthy explantion, just say "reverted (or changed or whatever) per talk," then explain your reasoning on talk. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 02:14, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jeigan

It appears that another admin has warned 24.168.74.153 about his edits to the talk page of this article. As for the article itself, I don't know enough about Fire Emblem to call his edits vandalism. Perhaps a good idea would be to provide sources refuting his claims. If this user becomes pushy or aggressive in any way, or seems to be ignoring attepts to reach an agreement, feel free to tell me and I'll be glad to assist.--Shanel 00:15, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Reverted, obviously. :)--Shanel § 01:26, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nintendo Wars

Please see Talk:Units in Nintendo Wars#Transwiki & Merge(?). Thank you. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 05:08, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm already aware of this. I have not had the chance to handle this because of events in my RL (which should at least be improving now, if only a notch). But I casted my vote. --Juigi Kario (Charge! * My crusades) 19:56, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oozium

That's what I thought. Nice to know my memory isn't that bad. -- Steel 18:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Famicom Wars

I gave it a level of medium, because the first game was significantly more popular than any other Wars games. - A Link to the Past (talk) 21:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Strategy games

Hello Juigi Kario.

WikiProject Strategy games has finished it's first collaboration: Risk (game) (). We are now asking for nominations and input for a new one. Please voice your ideas at the talk page.

Clyde (talk) and WikiProject Strategy games.

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Strategy games

Hello JuigiKario.

WikiProject Strategy games finished it's first collaboration on Risk (game). We have voted for possible candidates for the next collaboration, and three finalists have been selected:

  1. . Stronghold (2001 game)
  2. . Age of Empires
  3. . Age of Empires II

If possible, please vote here on which of these articles to collaborate on. Thank you.

WikiProject Strategy games

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:NWSeriesProject

Template:NWSeriesProject has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Shinhan 18:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GBW3Battle.png

Thanks for uploading Image:GBW3Battle.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GBW3Box.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GBW3Box.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Light and girlfriend

The movie is the only adaptation in which Light has a girlfriend -- in the singular. We all know he kills Shiori at the end. The manga and anime have him pretend to have girlfriends but he always plays them off against each other and manipulates them. The creators stated in How to Read 13 that Light is "incapable" of loving a woman. He kills Takada in all three versions (in the anime and manga she develops a romantic infatuation with Light) - but he also maintained a relationship with Misa and used her.

I must also add that Light does not kill his father in any of the versions. He tries to in the film, but fails. He never tries to kill his father in the anime or manga. The person who shoots Soichiro is a guy named Jose - not Mello himself. WhisperToMe (talk) 11:21, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

I know he manipulates Takada in the manga/anime and kills her in all 3 versions. But he felt better with Takada than he did with Misa, although that's not saying much as you indicate.
And I'm not concerned with who shot Soichiro; if Light wasn't the one behind the gun, he didn't try to kill Soichiro. Granted, the fake 13 Day Rule would have ensured that Light would have had Soichiro killed somehow before long, but the point is, if he didn't try to kill his father, the mention saying Light tried to kill Soichiro is invalid all the same.
But you removed that part anyway. And just to let you know: I didn't add it at all. --Juigi Kario (Charge! * My crusades) 00:31, 29 March 2008 (UTC)