User talk:Juhachi/Archive 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Archive 5 |
Archive 6
| Archive 7


Contents

Regarding Hayate the Combat Butler

You added some information on the light novel and other stuff. Please put references to support the information...

Thank you

Samantha Lim88 01:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)


Yeah, thanks a lot for telling me. I appreciate it.

Samantha Lim88 02:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:ひびわれた協奏曲.png

I have tagged Image:ひびわれた協奏曲.png as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Lucky Star

Concerning the number of episodes, just stating that there are "24" episodes can be ambiguous. It's unclear whether 24 episodes were released or it's scheduled for that amount. Writing "Scheduled for" won't do any harm any more than it does good, so why remove it? -- 10:36, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

It doesn't take time or effort for the "Scheduled for" to be deleted. Users who don't bother to look at the episode list might mistake the information stating that the anime has actually ended. If you insist, I won't bother changing it; suit yourself, I don't want any debate. -- 15:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)


Non-free use disputed for Image:Akira_and_Natashou.JPG

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Akira_and_Natashou.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 10:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:St. Lulim school seal.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:St. Lulim school seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Sayonara Zetsubo Sensei edits

1. The plot wasn't mine. It is the plot as given on the first volume of the manga, but yes, pure nonsense we don't need. 2. Why not to other wikis? Fansites, yes, no way. But that kind of wiki seems exactly the sort of further reading external links are designed for. Except for being in Japanese, which might make it not worth having. Or was this a policy I'm unaware of? 3. How is a list of ISBNs for the manga pointless? Seems like a valuable piece of information to me. Just as valuable as the anime episodes, and keeps the article a little less anime focused. Doceirias 03:52, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

That was pretty much the standard I had for wikis as well. But the sheer amount of content on that one suggested it met those criteria. There are literally thousands of jokes identified and explained by a large number of editors. And I did find the link on the Jwikipedia page.
An ISBN list for manga is a standard feature in articles for untranslated manga, just like a episode list is for articles on anime. Not sure how a list of ISBNs could be rewritten as prose - if it went to good article, the episode list would undoubtedly branch off into it's own page, as would the list of manga volumes.
One of things I'm concerned about here is an emphasis on anime adaptations over the source material. Allowing anime lists but cutting virtually all manga specific information is part of that. Obviously, a boring list of numbers is not exactly exciting, but it's better than dismissing the manga in a couple of lines. Any suggestions how would could make it better? Expand the list into something that would actually deserve it's own page? Doceirias 04:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Chronology of the Doctor Who universe

I must object to the vote count - one of those opposes was inactionable (Tribe of Gum's - the removal of specific citations in favour of a general citation to the same work was at the request of Circeus). Will (talk) 12:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Still, it's not really 8/4. Will (talk) 12:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)


Your GA nomination of Planetarian: Chiisana Hoshi no Yume

The article Planetarian: Chiisana Hoshi no Yume you nominated as a good article has failed , see Talk:Planetarian: Chiisana Hoshi no Yume for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a review. Giggy UCP 02:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

"Anime" refers to Planetarian (I couldn't think of a better word...). Sorry about that confusion. As for the characters section, I just think it looks a bit like listcruft (to an extent) to include it, but that's my opinion, and that isn't something I'd make a fuss or fail a GA over. If something is in the story, you can't cite that, as it's a self reference. Find a book review, or something along those lines...Amazon.com, etc. There must be some sources on the internet that discuss the work, and you can use them as references. Giggy UCP 02:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I still can't pass the article with the current referencing. If you still disagree with this, please take this to GAR. Thank you, Giggy UCP 23:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Aya_Hirano.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Aya_Hirano.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 07:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I have replaced the tag that you removed from this image. While it may be difficult for you to go to Japan and take a picture of her, it would be less difficult to:
  • contact a Japanese Wikipedian to take a picture of her at an appearance
  • contact her (agent) to request that they release an image of her under a compatible license
  • search flickr for existing pictures of her and request their copyright holder (if necessary) to release it under a compatible license.
~ BigrTex 19:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

not much

Hi, I'm not sure whether Wikipedia allows this kind of stuff on talk pages, but I was just wondering if an anime fan like you buys all your stuff or downloads them (for the stuff that aren't available easily). No meaning really, just wondering. Thanks. -- 16:40, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Anime OST pages

I thought I would get your input on this since you've created many of them. I'm thinking of starting up a page on the first OST for School Rumble. As far as I can tell, the series has 2 OSTs, several singles, and several character image albums. I've noticed though, that some series (like the ones you've worked on) have a consolidated list of all the music, whereas there are others that have individual articles for the albums. Is there anything stated anywhere that a move towards a consolidated page (s) is preferable to shorter, individual articles? I'm thinking I could also set up pages by album category (e.g. singles, OSTs, chara albums) if warranted. --BrokenSphere 19:11, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

After some digging last night, I found that the series has quite a few more albums than the ones mentioned. The thing is, source info (in English at least) beyond track listings at best for these additional albums is sparse to lacking. I'm wondering if there are any general sources that you use besides Amazon/Amazon Japan and CD Japan for song/album length, and who's attributed to each track. BTW, I can recognize Japanese but can't read it. Thanks. --BrokenSphere 15:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

It's interesting that you mention that, because it looks like my ability to flesh out the info for any albums that I can't d/l looks like it may be constrained, because I can't access them. I did take a look at the Chudah's Corner site that you used as a source, but unfortunately there's no SR music on it. I don't think we can talk about what sources for access we use in Wiki space. --BrokenSphere 15:45, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Just letting you know that I found a source that I've used to get some track info. The page linked to was found by putting in the Japanese title or a part of it. Hope it helps. --BrokenSphere 03:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Notability of 07th Expansion

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 07th Expansion, by JohnnyMrNinja (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 07th Expansion seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 07th Expansion, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC)


I also have an issue with you in this regard. What is your reason for tagging 07th Expansion for a speedy when it clearly does not satisfy the requirements for a speedy deletion? I must say, you've got a lot of nerve to try something like this. I have moved it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/07th Expansion for a discussion to take place on the issue.-- 02:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Wow, sorry to offend you. I do agree that they have some notable products, but I was unable to find anything on the internet implying the notability of the company itself. The article has no references other than the translated interview [1] that imply any sort of notability. Also, after reading it again, I wouldn't have put the tag on if I had been able to understand the lead. I was going on the "amateur Japanese company", which is contradicted later by "07th Expansion transitioned from a dojin soft maker to a commercial organization". "Amateur Japanese company" is an oxymoron and can mean any number of things. "These are the creators of Higurashi no Naku Koro ni, which (if you haven't realized) has an anime that has been adapted into English". How could I realize this? There is no mention in the article, and the speedy delete tag was for this article, not Higurashi no Naku Koro ni. The article doesn't even say what Higurashi no Naku Koro ni is. A reader shouldn't have to click on every link on an article to figure out if the topic is notable. But again, I meant no offense by it. ~ JohnnyMrNinja {talk} 02:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Featured List status for Calendar of Saints (Lutheran)

I was under the impression that candidates for featured lists were not to be regarded as failed after ten days if there were fewer than four votes and/or points of contention were actively being address. Did this change? If not, why was the article de-listed after only ten days while comments were being address and there were fewer than four support votes and no current oppose votes? -- jackturner3 14:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

While I understand your rationale for delisting in terms of the number of days since the last comment, I would still bring to your attention the fact that the guidelines clearly state that a FL nomination may remain after ten days if the nomination has fewer than four votes. So, even if the oppose comments had actively been addressed, then it would have been appropriate to leave the nomination in place for a few more days. -- jackturner3 13:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
I can accept that. It's an honest mistake really. I'll be a few days before I relist because someone has just posted some new material to the talk page and it needs to be digested before the article goes back up for review, so I'll put a note on your page when the time comes. -- jackturner3 16:47, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Emma Bentley

An article that you have been involved in editing, Emma Bentley, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Bentley. Thank you. -- Whpq 13:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Hack-Roots.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hack-Roots.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 11:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

WPVG dispute

I say that it should be there because just because WP:VN is kind of like a sub-project connected to WP:VG, people in WP:VG do not necessarily have any interest in expanding that article through your project. Some people are only affiliated in WP:VG, and may want to improve this article. And besides, it helps to categorize games. - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

I could get behind that, I suppose. However, just to note, cvgproj really covers anything video game-related; while it does have very little gameplay, it's still considered a game. I mean, look at Xenosaga for instance! :p - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/United States Secretary of Energy‎

Could you possibly reassess your vote on this matter since the changes you wanted were done--Southern Texas 01:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for that--Southern Texas 01:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Planetarian See also section

Is there a way to incorperate that little tidbit into the story perhaps, because it seems more like trivia to me.-- 17:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Only if the plot outline gets a lot more detailed. It is a little trivial, but I stuck it in there so that people that played the game might realize that it's an actual place. In any case, it doesn't do too much harm as a see also section does it?--SeizureDog 02:52, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Your Talk Page

Just to let you know, your talk page looks "stretched" in a 1024x720 resolution using Firefox. Maybe it's just be, but I thought I'd let you know..-- 16:19, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it's normal now.-- 19:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hibiki's Magic characters.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hibiki's Magic characters.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:38, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Suzuka (manga)

I noticed that the GA review is still on hold. What problems still need to be addressed? (Duane543 00:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC))

Hibiki's Magic

Awesome work, thanks for reacting so promptly to my comments :) Kamryn · Talk 21:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Tee hee

This edit summary made me giggle, because at first I thought it said "Cats shouldn't have macros". --Masamage 22:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Dengeki PS2 cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dengeki PS2 cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Haruhiism.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Haruhiism.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:45, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Infobox animanga/Header

This template, the way it is using html table tags, breaks under a not-so-permissive MediaWiki environment, and may end of working on wikipedia in the future. Sorry for directly editing the tempalte, but it's not easily copyiable. i did however take care on not breaking it, and repairing when failing to fix it the first time.

I thought i left it working. When you did this reversion what was broken? Platonides 20:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Which page was the affected? Platonides 20:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
I was testing in a page without the demographic argument. If you noted a problem with it, can you tell me on which page was, to avoid checking all the pages which use it, until find one with that parameter? Platonides

What's your problem?

I swear, the way you're acting sounds like you specifically dislike the project. Nowhere does it suggest that you can say "this is our article, you cannot put your template there". Visual novels are video games. The project is categorized under a VG category. By that extension, the video game project has SOME interest in this article. That's like saying that someone who was born in America and lived in Japan for the remainder of his life does not fall under the Japan WikiProject. - A Link to the Past (talk) 21:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for being a comprehensive reviewer and helping out with the Suzuka (manga) article. (Duane543 03:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC))

Re: Clannad (visual novel)

It was Newtype magazine, whatever that is, I don't know. However, there is supposed to be some convention going on now, and I think an official date will be released there beyond this autumn.Sbloemeke 02:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Heh, I'm sort of new to the anime world, so that may be why I haven't heard of it. :) Anyways, hopefully I'll find someone somewhere who went to the festa and got the announcement tommorow. If I do, I'll update it.Sbloemeke 02:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sola logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sola logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:Ponpon imageIllust.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ponpon imageIllust.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 23:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Note

Out of a random chance seeking out of my edits to Lucky Star (manga), I saw that you undid an edit of mine a couple of weeks ago. "Tokusatsu" is as much a word in English usage as is "anime" (although to a lesser degree). Additionally, "Kyodain" is not translated into "Brothers" or "Siblings," as it is part of the title of the show in katakana.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Tokusatsu is a Japanese term that is used to describe the "live action" shows in Japanese, English, Portuguese, etc. (see the interwiki links at Tokusatsu). Not all Japanese live action is tokusatsu, unlike how all Japanese animation is anime. The purpose of linking is so the reader learns more about other subjects. Piping that link is meaningless.
For Kyodain, that is the title of the series. It is not called "Space Ironmen Brothers" but "Space Ironmen Kyodain" (you'll find more by searching for "Uchuu Tetsujin Kyodain" than you would for "Space Ironmen Brothers"). I would appreciate if you did not undo my edits, again, as I feel that
  1. Tokusatsu is as much an encyclopedic term in the English language as anime is
  2. And "Kyodain" is the proper title of the song and show.
Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:29, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Re:Furukawa Nagisa

Furukawa Nagisa part is going to be very long. First of all I believe you have completely played Clannad, so I won't hold back on some points. If you didn't, I suggest you delete this talk immediately.

Should we make a page specifically for Nagisa? Because we have another alternation for After Story ending, which is the true end of the After Story, and on Ushio.

Not to mention the sad girl in the illusionary world. -RasAlmond

Gadget Trial's templates

Since I saw you're pretty experienced here, and contributed quite a number of edits, instead of reverting your edit, I would discuss it here. I fail to see why Gadget Trial isn't a visual novel, like Shuffle!, or Air. True, it doesn't contain objectionable material. (Although Ever 17 or Narcissu are visual novels too, despite this.) True, it isn't only a visual novel, it has a battle-oriented parts too. However, IMHO it is (in part) a visual novel, because a large part of it is like those. Thus, the VN template is required. What do you think? --Rev-san 15:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the information, I don't noticed that the VN wikiproject got absorbed. I'm not that experienced neither in concentration nor in being Wikipedish. Again, thanks. --Rev-san 20:09, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Although I think it's a pity. ^^' --Rev-san 20:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Admin

Hey. I've seen some of your anime edits around, and was wondering if you would like to consider adminship. I would certainly nominate you over at WP:RFA if you were interested. Let me know of your decision. Wizardman 21:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Concerning articles on W Wish and Final Approach

The user ChuChu is editing the above articles as Seinen. What do you think?-- 16:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I've done the RFC thing. I am sorry (to everyone) for having an edit war. I was kind of heated up by the user's rude comments. Should I leave it be after I've tagged the discussion page with the RFC?-- 19:56, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Rules

As you just warned be with WP:RRR, I don't want to go break more rules; so I wanted to ask you where I should start learning Wikipedia rules and regulation, styles, and so forth. Thanks.--(talk) 20:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Otome wa Boku ni Koishiteru

I translated what the guy said so you might want to check it out.--殺人事件 | talk 14:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

That's the translation of what you said for that person to read, sorry if it was confusing--殺人事件 | talk 16:16, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:涼宮ハルヒの詰合.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:涼宮ハルヒの詰合.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Host Club episode 3.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Host Club episode 3.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:千年の雪.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:千年の雪.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Sunohara Youhei.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sunohara Youhei.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Sunohara Mei.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sunohara Mei.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:ひぐらしのなく頃に.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ひぐらしのなく頃に.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Many worlds/ontological

Please bear with me, since I'm not all the way through the show. (I find it troubling and rather disturbing so I'm taking it slow). I thought part of the story dealt with how the information somewhat filters through each storyline which I think falls under ontological paradox. Yeah, many worlds MAY fit better. Not that I'm gonna make a big deal about it. :P I prefer the ontological paradox in Haruhi anyways. :P Kyaa the Catlord 08:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Lucky Star

I totally forgot about the "Three revert rule", I apologize for that. Anyway, I'm not continuing with this anymore, if it gets reverted back to shounen or whatever, I don't care. Can't someone just lock the demographic and genre so they can't be changed? ChuChu 09:53, 9 September 2007

Ok, I see, then lets do what you said in case it gets reverted back.
As to W Wish and Final Approach, I have watched both anime (I watch any new anime thats based on a bsihoujo game, though I'm not a bishoujo gamer (not much at least LOL)). it should be obvious that any type of bishoujo game and anime based on these games are not aimed at females. The day when bishoujo games like W Wish and Final Approach start to be aimed at females is the day when something really weird has happened to japanese females. If the demographic in those two entries get reverted back to shoujo, I wouldn't mind, hopefully some japanese bishoujo gamer will see those wiki entries and giggle a little, or at least crack a little smile. ChuChu 10:33, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I also linked to that PrincessSoft site and told him that the girls side is the side of the site were the games for males are, but that didn't seem to convince him >.> and what happened after that? that discussion, as silly as it was, got deleted O.o why delete stuff from my own talk page? --ChuChu 12:01, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to interupt, but Seihin is the romanization of "製品" which means "Products". It is still not confirmed that the game is Seinen. As for the girls side, it says "通常" which means "General". So in fact, it is not confirmed that it's a seinen game.--殺人事件 | talk 22:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
OK, I lose. I do say I think it is pretty much of a Seinen game considering it's a 美少女 game. Can you please change the Anime News Network article then? I do personally feel that the Final Approach story-line of the Anime was "Shoujoish" though having watched them.--殺人事件 | talk 22:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Populous: The Beginning GA on hold

A few editors and I have, I believe, addressed all the concerns you mentioned. (the only thing I didn't add to was how you get from planet to planet, as it's a gaping plot hole that is never mentioned). David Fuchs (talk) 17:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Aya Hirano External Links

Why was the fansite removed from Aya Hirano External Links? What constitutes "non-notable"? It has plenty of information and media that this site doesn't have and isn't that the point of external links, to give more info on the topic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.61.228.58 (talk) 19:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC) --148.61.228.58 19:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Yuumao.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Yuumao.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 21:24, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Light novel mergers

Hello. Remember to add {{R from merge}} to the redirects you're creating on the Haruhi light novel articles. Thanks. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 01:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Concerning Girls' Life and Girls' Revolution

Both light novel labels; Jam Novels and Jam Plus Novels, these are not male oriented labels. the publisher does not mention the target readership of these two labels. most likely these are general labels.

I think Girls' Life and Girls' Revolution should be left without a certain demographic mentioned. There are major male oriented light novel labels that have yuri works being published under them (like Dengeki Bunko's Strawberry Panic!), but these labels (Jam Novels and Jam Plus Novels) are not male oriented labels.

Anyway, its to your choice, I wouldn't mind both of them being mentioned having a seinen demographic, since I'm also seinen (LOL). --ChuChu 22:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Gift logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Gift logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Daybreak Image...

Kanpai! Was there a problem with my image? --Hoshi no hate 12:11, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Orange Pocket

Out of curiousity, what caused your sudden influx of attention to Orange Pocket? Not complaining of course, I'm just a bit perplex as it is not Key related (which is your normal main focus) nor has any anime adaptation (of which would cause retroactive interest in the visual novel). --SeizureDog 01:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Probably just bad information caused be to say that Elf made it. It's been so long since I made the article that I can't even remember what my logic was for making it in the first place. I probably made it because it's one of those few visual novels with a console port.--SeizureDog 01:45, 28 September 2007 (UTC)