User talk:Judicata

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Not sure why your comments were treated with such visciousness

But I'm interested in your ideas. I've suggested on the talk page that someone initiate a peer review of the article. As it is now there seems to be very little regard for NPOV on "both sides of the debate" and the consensus is marginal at best. Anyhow, I'm certainly interested in your ideas on how the article can be improved. Angry Christian (talk) 22:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the words. I'll continue contributing, and hopefully this article can improve. I've further commented on your talk page. Judicata (talk) 23:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please consider taking the AGF Challenge

I would like to invite you to consider taking part in the AGF Challenge which has been proposed for use in the RfA process [1] by User: Kim Bruning. You can answer in multiple choice format, or using essay answers, or anonymously. You can of course skip any parts of the Challenge you find objectionable or inadvisable.--Filll (talk) 21:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Will do when I have some time. Judicata (talk) 21:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)