User talk:Judge John

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user is a sock puppet of Gsnguy, and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to contributions for evidence.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

[edit] JUDGE JOHN'S COURT ROOM

Today's Case: Mr.T99 (The Vandalism Kid) is suing a ban for vandalism his very own talk page, and other stuff. We will talk with TPiRFanSteve, Lambertman, and their bosses Frisfron of Rochester, and CIFF today.

Folks, how did Mr.T99 vandalize the web pages? What pages did he vandalize?

WTF is this? Seriously. --CFIF ☎ ⋐ 13:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

This is a court room were i discuss about Wikipedia Members vandalizing.

[edit] This is not in the Wiki Spirit

This sort of thing really doesn't belong in wikipedia. We have a perfectly good system at wiki of warning templates, reporting pages, and administrator action to deal with any such thing that you could want to have here. What you are proposing here (by the existance of this "court room" is actually vandalism itself in a way - it's using wikii for purposes other than those which are intended, it's disruptive, any accusation made here can be easily construed as a personal attack or harrassment, and it serves no part in either the wiki processes, or in the editing of articles.

I would hope (as I choose to believe at this moment) that you would like to make a positive contribution to Wikipedia, but I would have to politely suggest that this is not the way to do it.

Please would you consider choosing another of the many useful ways in which you can contribute to this encyclopedia, and please sign your talk comments with foure tildes (~~~~) Thanks for understanding. --Crimsone 18:30, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

And another thing: you'd do well to learn how to spell "where" correctly. -TPIRFanSteve 20:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "auto"

Decline reason: "Incoherent unblock request. — Yamla 16:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Today's Case: Bot Machine 3. The crook who stole lots of wikipedia articles. Judge John (talk) 21:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "You haven't provided a reason why you should be unblocked. — Addhoc (talk) 12:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.