User talk:Judas goat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Zhivan Wasinski

A tag has been placed on Zhivan Wasinski, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. If you can indicate how Zhivan Wasinski is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}}, and also put a note on Talk:Zhivan Wasinski saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions.Diez2 00:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of John 'Haystacks' Maguire

A tag has been placed on John 'Haystacks' Maguire, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Ridernyc 22:47, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of GS&MPU

A tag has been placed on GS&MPU, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G2.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Into The Fray T/C 23:26, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your revert of Berowa, New South Wales

I have reverted your recent edit to Berowra, New South Wales, which was unhelpful to the Wiki project. Some reasons -- a candelestick maker doesn’t make candles, so perhaps you mean a candle maker. A “gentlemans (sic) lounge” would need referencing.The people working on the railways were indeed “fettlers”, (settlers were covered a few words on in the article). A claim that “Plans for a pagan based primary school were shelved after a campaign of threats and intimidation by angry residents in 2006” would need to be backed up by reference/s. Ditto “A growing number of residents however could be seen to be embracing atheism when compared with previous statistical data”. Furthermore, the redlinked James 'Jim-Bob' Maguire is not a Notable Resident of Berowra unless you can give cites to show he is. He isn’t notable just because he is the father of John 'Haystacks' Maguire, who is also a non notable. Please don’t revert again. Moriori 00:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of GS&MPU

GS&MPU, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that GS&MPU satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GS&MPU and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of GS&MPU during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Into The Fray T/C 01:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Dunning.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dunning.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 03:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3rr warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ben Cousins. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Gnangarra 03:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)