Talk:Judy Greer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

	Chicago Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles related to Chicago.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Arrested Development image

Is her character on Arrested Development cross-eyed? If not, I'm sure a more flattering image could be located. 23skidoo 06:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Hehe, she's meant to be cross-eyed when she takes off her spectacles. But I agree, she's quite a nice-looking woman, and I'm sure there are better images out there. — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • 06:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

At the very least it needs to be explained that the character is cross-eyed, not the actress. In fact, I really think that image is inappropriate and misleading and am going to follow the Be Bold principle and remove it altogether. I think this is a case where better no image at all than one like this. It's ugly and it gives the impression that the actress is cross-eyed. Wikipedia is a very widely seen website and more care needs to be taken in the choice of images. 23skidoo 13:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Good call! Bergsten 08:29, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion??

Hello everbody, I've added a cleanup tag because this article lacks a lot of info to qualify as a wikipedia article. It only offers a filmography, which is also available at imdb, and history concerning the actress is non-existant. I've also noticed that the birthplace is given as Livonia, Michigan while at imdb and the other external link tv.com it's given as Detroit, Michigan so which one is it?? I favor deletion, does anybody else share this viewpoint? Thank you -- Witchinghour 15:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

I agree that the article could be improved, but I see no reason to delete it. She obviously exist and should be notable by any reasonable standard. Bergsten 10:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

I agree. The fact an article is a stub is not valid criteria for deletion. She's a notable actress with plenty of credits. Some articles sit as stubs for years before someone gets around to expanding them. As noted above, though, I did delete the image as it was really terrible for an article like this. I also changed the tag from Cleanup (there really isn't anything to clean up) to the more appropriate Expand. 23skidoo 13:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)