Talk:Judas Ø
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
 |
This article is part of the Smashing Pumpkins WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of The Smashing Pumpkins. If you would like to participate please visit the project page. Any questions pertaining to Smashing Pumpkins-related articles should be directed to the project's talk page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the assessment scale |
Maybe this should be Judas Ø, seeing as that's what it says on the disc itself.--[[User:HamYoyo|HamYoyo (Talk)]] 16:20, Jun 3, 2004 (UTC)
I don't understand why Rotten Apples and Judas 0 have two separate pages. It would be like separate pages for Dawn to Dusk and Twilight to Starlight. --Dbenbenn 22:49, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Judas 0 was a limited edition release. It's not a given that every copy of Rotten Apples also contains Judas 0, as is the case with MCIS. Pumpkingrrl 07:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Most limited edition bonus discs are put on the same page as what they were released with, but in this case, it seems like Judas 0 had enough of a life on its own. I wouldn't be against the combination, but I like the current separation. Folkor 16:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- Example: Still (Nine Inch Nails album) -- Jon Dowland 13:32, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- This is true. Most limited edition bonus discs usually have either not many tracks on them, or are live recordings; alternate cuts; etc...
- I consider this disc substantial enough to be it's own album. 125.238.16.70 00:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] Judas 0, Judas O, Judas Ø...?
Does anyone have a definitive answer as to which variation is the correct one? Zero, O without Stroke, O with Stroke? -- Christopher C. Parker t c 19:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Smashing Pumpkins Greatest Hits album cover.jpg
Image:Smashing Pumpkins Greatest Hits album cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
