Talk:Juan Pablo Ángel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Juan Pablo Ángel article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
This article is within the scope of the Colombian WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to Colombia-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards. Click here and join us!.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
WikiProject on Football The article on Juan Pablo Ángel is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by the WikiProject on Argentine football.
This article is supported by the England task force.
This article is supported by the USA and Canada task force.

[edit] Comments

Among the best players of all time? The link provided makes no such claim. If no one has a better link to support this, I'm going to reword the article to better reflect what is said in the link. Faithlessthewonderboy 10:09, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't see where it ever says "best of ALL time", it says "best AT the time". This is an important distinction. Having said that, I don't think the link makes that claim either although it could have changed? It probably should be re-worded but I just wanted to point that out. --otduff t/c 17:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
My mistake, you're quite right. I'll give it a couple days just to see if anyone else has something to say, then I'll see if I can't improve it. Faithlessthewonderboy 20:31, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
It was commentary and I've removed it.--Jersey Devil 02:32, 20 August 2007 (UTC)