User talk:Jtneill

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment

Feel free to add comments - I appreciate discussion and collaboration. - Past Talk

Contents

[edit] Wikiproject homeschooling

Hi Jtneill!

I noticed you were a member of WikiProject Alternative Education, and thought you might be interested in WikiProject Homeschooling. In this "WikiProject," we have been together working on the collaboration of Homeschooling-related articles. As a member, I really hope you can join, and let me know if you need any help signing up or with anything else. If you have any questions about the project you can ask at the project's talk page. Cheers! RC-0722 communicator/kills 23:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternative education

There has been a proposal brought forward [1] regarding a merger of WikiProject Alternative Education, and as you are member of that project, I am notifying you. Thanks. Twenty Years 13:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] social ecology

thanks for the link =) Lucychili (talk) 23:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion request

Hi. I looked at your deletion request. There's too much that still links to the old page. Go through the stuff in the "what links here" list, and when it's empty I'll happily delete it for you. --McCormack (talk) 15:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm. Suddenly I realised I was on WP and not Wikiversity any more. You somehow automatically diverted me here. Which talk page do you normally use? --McCormack (talk) 15:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Incidentally, I never look at my WP talk page ;-) --McCormack (talk) 15:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

thanks interesting i wonder if some of the usa talo folk might be interested in tackling that law. their libraries association has publically stated they would be supportive and some movement to address that kind of assumption that exclusion = safety would be lovely to see from the usa. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.97.117 (talk) 12:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Dogbook

A tag has been placed on Dogbook requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)