User talk:Jpeob/Archive 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Constitution of Kyrgyzstan

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on Constitution of Kyrgyzstan. KazakhPol 01:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

No worries. It's an interesting article. Thus, it's on my watchlist! Cheers, Jpe|ob 01:22, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Karl Stefanovic

I'd like to see you prove that Karl Stefanovic is NOT an android. And you're kidding yourself if you think Jessica Rowe isn't a cackling fool. Peace out! Kit_Fallapart 10:52, 13 November 2006

You want to place the onus of proof on me? That is more hilarious than any laugh you are getting from vandalism. Please contribute positively to the project. Cheers, Jpe|ob 11:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

I do apologise. I came to thinking about the fact that I use Wikipedia everyday looking for only facts, not a laugh. Sorry mate. Karl Stefanovic. User:Kit_Fallapart 09:21, 14 November 2006

No worries. Now go forth and help us build this thing! Cheers, Jpe|ob 22:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 5000!?!?!?

Saw this while viewing "recent changes".... congratulations! I have about half what you have =) —EdGl 03:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Cheers. Here's to continued success on the project for all of us! Jpe|ob 11:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Augustine of Hippo

ok —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.137.28.64 (talk • contribs) 04:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Thankyou, Jpe|ob 04:18, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rotary International

hello, I noticed that you removed the Rotary International to CeeGee version.

May I know why ? I removed what placed CeeGee and what you called "blanked the version"

  • because the actual text comes from the Rotary itself as explained by CeeGee
  • because IP 24.xxx (?) recently just edited Rotary International + Rotary Foundation and nothing else
  • because CeeGee is Rotarian
  • because Rotary is active on Internet to uplift their public image
  • because this actual text receive no confirmation from other sources than Rotary
  • because Rotary, for example is in conflict for recruitment with Lions and often compares to Lions
  • because Wiki is frequently used bu Rotary to smooth image. There are frequent conflicts on that page
  • because their behavior is caracterized as Wikipedia fiddling

thank you for your answer, PierreLarcin 15:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

There is no evidence of a concerted campaign to put false information onto the page. Acting in good faith, I re-added text that is likely to be correct. Can you explain this edit summary of yours? Cheers, Jpeob 22:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
well YES there is such a campaign, as there was in France such edits coming from users who just edited Rotary-related wiki articles, and in a positive ways. will come later on that.

More : they post info copied from Rotarian sites. This is not info. Not possible to cross the info with other sources.

explain the edit summary : well the preceding version was insulting for rotary, with allusion to ku klux klan and strip dancers as rotary if you check at the bottom. I did not suscribe to all content. I work here with blind facilities. My interest was to clean insults quickly. In the Flemish wiki of Rotary, I was banned because I let once, i mean one time only, the word "dictator" in front of Pinochet... I am afraid of Rotarian provocations. I noticed your good faith. I knew it. The problem is that I practice CeeGee since a long time. 84.102.229.40 23:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC) Plus a problem : I loose my login when i come from french wiki. Noticed PierreLarcin in above right corner but when editing, signed by IP. Here is again my signature PierreLarcin 23:41, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

as long as edits are neutral point of view and are verifiable, then they should stand. Try not to slander other editors as acting in bad faith. Instead, refrain from edit warring, and discuss concerns on the talk page, based on facts, not personal attacks. Thanks, Jpeob 08:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
There is a point which is not clear : when Rotary says that he has 70.000 members on its Internet sites and when a Rotarian comes on wiki, sourcing on there Rotarian sites, and writes in the Wiki 'Rotary International, subchapter membership' that Rotary has 70.000 members, because Rotary sites say that. Is this info "Rotary has 70.000 members" then verifiable ?

For me, no, definitely no, because CeeGee is a member of Rotary, Rotary is struggling with Lions, and Rotary practices public relations. And for you ? Thank you for your American (?) opinion. You have my French one. Thank you for your answer :-). PierreLarcin 22:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

All should be sourced per our verification policy. Per WP:RS#Company_and_organization_websites, information sourced from an organisation such as Rotary can be used as long as you do not copy biased material. If the "70000 members" claim is sourced by Rotary, it would be very hard to prove that their statistics are inherently biased purely because they are self-created. All approximations of membership for any society are necessarily created by such a society. Jpeob 22:20, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks for the link. It is very difficult for me to find such a source. Have a good day :-) 84.102.229.40 04:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: AfDs

I responded to your query that you placed on my talk page. My response can be found here. Feel free to post any further comments on my talk page, and I'll respond to you as soon as possible. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Opening Section of Poland

Please stop removing stuff from the Opening Section of Poland. Why are you doing it? I hope that you did this for the last time without going through discussion section of Poland! Thanks! --Thomaspca 03:17, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Per Talk:Poland#.22World-famous_people.22, such a paragraph is out of place in a lead, especially considering it is covered elsewhere. Further, please use edit summaries in your edits, they're civil, and tell other editors what you are doing. Otherwise, your edits have less of an air of legitimacy. Jpeob 05:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR & Vandalism

The 3RR rule doesn't apply for reverting simple vandalism. Check the WP:3RR.--Hatch68 01:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

I know. But it's better to have multiple users reverting vandalism. Cheers, Jpeob 01:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:BishopAnthonyFisherCoatofArms.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:BishopAnthonyFisherCoatofArms.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

I concur! Delete - esp. if orphaned! Jpeob 13:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kim Beazley

re info box - thanks! regards --Merbabu 02:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

no worries. Jpeob 02:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What was wrong with the edit?

? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.128.87.33 (talk • contribs) 04:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC).

blatant vandalism. Jpeob 04:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your input is requested

Your input would be appreciated at this Request for Comments. Kelly Martin (talk) 18:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Diocesan Infobox

To the WikiProject Catholicism members

I have proposed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism an infobox for Catholic Dioceses. I have not gotten any feedback on this proposal, so I’m culling feedback, advice, corrections, etc. for this. If you have the time, would you check out User:SkierRMH/Diocese_Infobox and give me some feedback! Thanks much!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by SkierRMH (talk • contribs) 01:30, 8 December 2006

[edit] Warning substitution

I have replied on my talk. --Chris (talk) 09:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hey, man!

Antarctica IS a block of ice, though... Come on :/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.136.195.71 (talk) 00:42, 12 December 2006 (UTC).

Antarctica is also a continent. Jpeob 00:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Well, let's keep both than, I guess. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.136.195.71 (talk) 01:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC).
It's covered elsewhere, using more technical terms. See WP:LEAD. Jpeob 01:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My apologies

sorry about that revert, I must have been going too fast. Thanks for telling me. Red Director 03:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

responded at your talk page. Jpeob 03:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Un-Deletion Review for the Arizona Jewelers Association

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Arizona Jewelers Association. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 71.223.143.86 00:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My Request for Adminship

Jpeob/Archive 3

Thanks for your support on my successful Request for Adminship (final result 78 Support /0 Oppose / 1 Neutral) I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months. I am humbled by your kind support and would certainly welcome any feedback on my actions. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Once again, many thanks and happy new year! All the best, Asteriontalk 16:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Listed for deletion: Alan Carpenter

An article that you have edited significantly, Alan Carpenter, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Carpenter. Please look there to see why this is if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Auroranorth 13:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

  • AfD was closed as keep. DanielT5 19:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:125YearsJoeys.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:125YearsJoeys.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 18:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:125YearsJoeys.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:125YearsJoeys.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:125YearsJoeys.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:125YearsJoeys.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Stvincentscrest.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stvincentscrest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 12:52, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Loretokirribillicrest.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Loretokirribillicrest.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Thearmidaleschoolgreen1.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Thearmidaleschoolgreen1.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Stanniescrest.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Stanniescrest.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Garrie 04:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Oakhillcollegecrest.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Oakhillcollegecrest.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Garrie 04:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Stpiusxcollegechatswoodcrest.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Stpiusxcollegechatswoodcrest.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Garrie 05:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:AAGPS NSW logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AAGPS NSW logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Garrie 05:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Stanniescrest.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stanniescrest.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Stpiusxcollegechatswoodcrest.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stpiusxcollegechatswoodcrest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:AusWomensWeeklyaug06cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AusWomensWeeklyaug06cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Moe ε 13:33, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia shortcut WP:EI

Last year, you created this shortcut, to point to the proposal Wikipedia:Editor integrity. That proposal is inactive, and only four pages in Wikipedia had links to this shortcut. I'd like to substitute a new shortcut, WP:EdIn, for the existing one (I'd edit the four pages to make the change there), and then use the WP:EI shortcut for the Editor's index that will be moving into Wikipedia namespace soon. If you have any objections (and happen to read this in the next couple of weeks), please let me know. Thanks. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:35, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

I sent e-mail to Special:Emailuser/Jpeob about this request. And for the record, the backlinks in question are: Special:Whatlinkshere/WP:EI. Also see: Special:Whatlinkshere/Wikipedia:Editor integrity. --Teratornis 19:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sceggsdarlinghusrtcrest.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sceggsdarlinghusrtcrest.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:29, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC).

[edit] WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC).


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Standrewscollegecrest.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Standrewscollegecrest.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RomanCatholicArchdioceseofSydneyshield.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:RomanCatholicArchdioceseofSydneyshield.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)