Talk:Journal of Forensic Accounting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 27 May 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

If the notability is in question, do not delete it but place the notability tag. Please see: WP:NOTE Jheiv (talk) 22:13, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Also, Hu12, please See WP:DP for the Wikipedia Deletion Policy. Please submit a Proposed Deletion before simply deleting. Thanks.Jheiv (talk) 22:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

see Wikipedia:CSD, needs to meet WP:NOTE, before it can be included in the article space. I'm trying to do you a favor rather than having it speedy deleted off wikipedia. --Hu12 (talk) 22:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
The journal has been independently reviewed by at least two universities as "B- Quality". I'm not sure how much more notable it needs to be. Certainly, inclusion is valuable in the wikipedia space.Jheiv (talk) 22:58, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

perhaps you need to read:

I have read all these. I just want the community to decide, and would like the standard protocol followed. If the community decides its not worthy for WP, then fine, but that is a discussion to be had on the talk page of the article, like is spelled out in WP:DP. I realize you are concerned with the article's merits, but this should be a community decision. Jheiv (talk) 23:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

You are Forum shopping, repeatedly asking for additional outside opinions until you get an opinion you like. Based on your edit history, you exist for the sole and primary purpose of promoting R.T. Edwards publications in apparent violation of Conflict of interest or anti-spam guidelines.--Hu12 (talk) 00:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
I just think you are the only editor that disagrees with the edits ... If you could just open it up to the community, I would be fine with their assessment. I only ask for outside support when you constantly revert my changes that I have reverted back from yours. My edit history certainly goes far beyond editing pages with those links.Jheiv (talk) 00:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Actually, most of your edits do relate to this journal or your employer. You should simply request that an impartial third party create a new article at WP:REQUESTS, offering this stub as a start (but lose the WorldCat listing). --Orange Mike | Talk 00:41, 20 May 2008 (UTC)


    • Different Opinion: I think this is a valid attempt at an article--I am defending it at deletion review. I am not sure it is important, but that can be decided at AfD. DGG (talk) 01:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
    • I have added a ton of content to the page, can someone consider moving it back into article space and see how it fares? Thanks for your time and everyone's input! Jheiv (talk) 07:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Possible reference

I'm not sure if this will be of any use to you, as it is very short, but the "Encyclopedia of White-collar & Corporate Crime" states:

"The Journal of Forensic Accounting provides recent empirical and theoretical studies in the forensic auditing field". (Walsh, Patrick D (2005). "forensic auditing". Encyclopedia of White-collar & Corporate Crime. Ed. Salinger, Lawrence M.. SAGE. p. 332. ISBN 0761930043. )

It The reference may well be too trivial, but I found it interesting as it was the only journal (indeed, the only publication) mentioned in the entry. - Bilby (talk) 03:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)