Journalistic scandal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please help improve this article or section by expanding it.
Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. (August 2007)

Topics in journalism
Professional issues
News • Reportage • Writing • Ethics • Objectivity • Values • Attribution • Defamation • Editorial independence • Education • Other topics
Fields
Arts • Business • Entertainment • Environment • Fashion • Politics • Science • Sports • Tech • Trade • Traffic • Weather
Genres
Advocacy journalism Citizen journalism Civic journalism Community journalism Gonzo journalism Investigative journalism Literary journalism Narrative journalism New Journalism Opinion journalism Visual journalism Watchdog journalism
Social impact
Fourth Estate Fifth Estate Freedom of the press Infotainment Media bias News propaganda Public relations Yellow journalism
News media
Newspapers Magazines News agencies Broadcast journalism Online journalism Photojournalism Alternative media Vlog
Roles
Journalist • Reporter • Editor • Columnist • Commentator • Photographer • News presenter • Meteorologist
This box: view • talk • edit

Journalism scandals are high-profile incidents or acts, whether intentional or accidental, that run contrary to the generally accepted ethics and standards of journalism, or otherwise violate the 'ideal' mission of journalism: to report news events and issues accurately and fairly.

1 Journalistic scandal
- 1.1 Common characteristics
2 See also
3 Notes
4 External links

[edit] Journalistic scandal

As the investigative and reporting face of the media, journalists are usually required to follow various journalistic standards. These may be written and codified, or customary expectations. Typical standards include references to honesty, journalistic bias, responsibility, an appropriate balance between privacy and public interest, financially motivated writing, and the means used to obtain information which may be legitimate or criminal.

Journalistic scandals are public scandals arising from incidents where in the eyes of some party, these standards were significantly breached. In most journalistic scandals, deliberate or accidental acts take place that run contrary to the generally accepted ethics and standards of journalism, or otherwise violate the 'ideal' mission of journalism: to report news events and issues accurately and fairly.

[edit] Common characteristics

Journalistic scandals include: plagiarism, fabrication, and omission of information; activities that violate the law, or violate ethical rules; the altering or staging of an event being documented; or making substantial reporting or researching errors with the results leading to libelous or defamatory statements.

All journalistic scandals have the common factor that they call into question the integrity and truthfulness of journalism. These scandals shift public focus and scrutiny onto the media itself. Because credibility is journalism's main currency, many news agencies and mass media outlets have strict codes of conduct and enforce them, and use several layers of editorial oversight to catch problems before stories are distributed.

However, in many of the cases listed below, investigations later found that long-established journalistic checks and balances in the newsrooms failed. In some cases, senior editors fail to catch bias, libel, or fabrication inserted into a story by a reporter. In other cases, the checks and balances were omitted in the rush to get an important, 'breaking' news story to press (or on air). Furthermore, in many libel and defamation case, the publication would had full support of editorial oversight in case of yellow journalism.