Journalism in Australia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
Please improve this article if you can. (June 2007)

This article or section may require restructuring to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
Please discuss this issue on the talk page. This article has been tagged since June 2007.

The professional practice of Journalism in Australia varies from international standards in areas as diverse as legal freedoms and editorial practices.

1 History
2 Legal protection
- 2.1 Implied freedom
- 2.2 Lange v ABC
3 Education
4 Public perception
5 See also
6 References
7 External links

[edit] History

The front page of the Sydney Gazette.

Most of the published material in the first twenty years of the New South Wales colony was to inform residents of the rules and laws on the time. These were printed with a portable wooden and iron printing press. Since half of the convicts of the time were not able to read, it was compulsory for these notices to be read at Sunday church services. ^[1]

On 22 November 1800 George Howe arrived in Australia. Nicknamed Happy, George was born in the West Indies, although his father had been a native of Ireland. ^[2] In London George had worked in the print industry for several newspapers including The Times, but was sent to New South Wales after being charged with shoplifting, a crime which was also punishable by hanging.

In March 1803 Howe started production on Australia's first newspaper, The Sydney Gazette. While much of its content was government notices, there was also an abundance of news to report in the burgeoning colony. An extract from the paper about the first Koala to be captured told of the "graveness of the visage", which "would seem to indicate a more than ordinary portion of animal sagacity". ^[3]

One newsgathering technique Howe used for local content was to hang a slip box outside the store where the Gazette was published to let the public suggest stories. Because of the country's geographic isolation, international news arriving via arriving ships was usually printed 10 to 14 weeks out of date.

The Sydney Gazette was the only paper published until 1824 when William Wentworth began publishing the colony's first privately owned newspaper, The Australian (no connection with the current paper of the same name, which was established by Rupert Murdoch in 1964). ^[4]

The Australian Journalist's Association (AJA) was formed in 1910 and registered federally in 1911. ^[5] Ten years later in 1921 the University of Queensland became the first Australian institution to offer a diploma of journalism. ^[6] The AJA was amalgamated in 1992 into the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance. ^[7]

In 1956, Ampol Petroleum founder Sir William Gaston Walkley established Australia's most prestigious Journalism Awards, the Walkleys. ^[8]

On October 16, 1975, five Australian journalists, now known as the Balibo Five, reporting on the invasion of East Timor (then Portuguese Timor) by Indonesia were murdered at a house in Balibo. The journalists, from both the Nine Network and the Seven Network, were killed by Indonesian soldiers after recording footage which proved Indonesia was behind the conflict, as opposed to the claim it was an internal Timorese coup. ^[9]

Paul Moran, an ABC cameraman from Adelaide became the first Australian journalist to die while covering the Iraq war in March 2003. He was killed while working when a car bomb near him exploded. ^[10] The ABC foreign correspondent working with Moran, Eric Campbell, survived the explosion and went on to write about the incident in his book Absurdistan.^[11]

[edit] Legal protection

Australian journalists are more vulnerable to defamation action than many of their international counterparts.^{[citation needed]} Australia lacks both a bill of rights and any specific or explicit rights to freedom of speech in the Australian constitution. ^[12] The 2006 Reporters Without Borders survey ranking the countries of the world in relative press freedom listed Australia as number 35 behind Ghana and Mauritius. Australia's score of nine had increased greatly since scoring a much better three in 2002. According to the Australia's Right to Know campaign, a collaborative effort between all major Australian media publishers and outlets, major causes in the decline of press freedom include anti-terrorism legislation (Australian anti-terrorism legislation, 2004 and Australian Anti-Terrorism Act 2005), sedition laws, suppression orders and Freedom of Information requests.^[13]

[edit] Implied freedom

In 1992 the High Court of Australia saw the case of Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth, concerning a decision the previous year which inserted Part IIID into the Broadcasting Act 1942. The resulting regulations banned political advertising during Federal, State or Local elections. There was some free time provided for political messages, but 90% of this was allocated to parties in the previous government. A majority decision found in favour of Australian Capital Television, ruling there was an implied right to freedom of political communication in the constitution.

“

the system of representative government created by the Constitution, or at least the text of sections 7 and 24, necessarily requires for its efficacy that the Australian people are able to discuss freely matters relating to Australian government.^[14]

”

The 4-3 decision of the Theophanous v Herald and Weekly Times Ltd case two years later enforced the previous ruling to the extent of validating the constitution's implied freedom of speech as a defamation defense, ^[14] however this would not last.

[edit] Lange v ABC

In 1997 the High Court heard the case of former New Zealand Prime Minister Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation on the rulings of the Theophanous and Stephens v West Australian Newspapers. "While the judges unanimously confirmed the existence of an implied constitutional freedom of political speech, they did not cite it as a defense against defamation action by politicians."^[15]

Since Australian law does not currently accept the implied freedoms as a defamation defense, Australian journalists facing slander or libel must use common law defense. This involves the defendant proving that they:^[15]

did not believe defamatory imputations were true
undertook reasonable steps to confirm the accuracy of defamatory information
had reasonable grounds for a belief that defamatory imputations were true
included a response from the defamed person, except where this was seen as not practical or was unnecessary

[edit] Education

Many Australian universities provide journalism and communication courses. The majority of new Australian journalists have a tertiary education in the field. In 2000, seven of eight cadetships given by the Age were given to those with a journalism degree. ^[15] The following Australian tertiary educational institutions provide Journalism courses:

[edit] Public perception

This article or section relies largely or entirely upon a single source.
Please help improve this article by introducing appropriate citations of additional sources.

A 2004 Roy Morgan Research survey of journalists and the public about the practice of journalism in Australia showed that Australians are generally sceptical of the ethics of the media. Some results include the following:^[16]

How would you rate these professions for honesty and ethical standards?

Profession	2001	2004
Doctors	75%	81%
Police	58%	57%
Talback announcers	17%	18%
TV reporters	18%	16%
Newspaper journalists	13%	10%
State MPs	14%	10%
Federal MPs	16%	9%

Do you believe that...

	Newspaper journalists	TV reporters	Talkback hosts
Are often biased	86%	73%	75%
Often get their facts wrong	63%	54%	55%
Invade people's privacy unnecessarily	69%	74%	26%
Are too left-leaning	22%	20%	17%
Are too right-leaning	22%	17%	26%