User talk:Josh Keen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Speedy deletion of Hindu terrorism

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Triwbe (talk) 11:27, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

The article "Hindu terrorism" is not a personal attack. Only a fanatic would think that. Everyone else would agree it's a notable topic for an encyclopedia to cover. Josh Keen (talk) 09:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Recent comments about Hindus and Muslims

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. PhilKnight (talk) 23:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't have to assume good faith when one of the main protagonists is a proven sock puppet. I find it very suspicious that you both constantly remove the same material, and act in the same manner. Josh Keen (talk) 09:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

You have to assume good faith in regard to editors of different religious beliefs than you. Just because there was a sock puppet, it doesn't allow you to assume bad faith in regard to Hindu and Muslim editors. PhilKnight (talk) 11:19, 29 May 2008 (UTC)