User talk:Joseph Solis in Australia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] My RfA[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:StarksnYK.jpgThanks for uploading Image:StarksnYK.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC) [edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Jerry_lucas_350.jpgThanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jerry_lucas_350.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] Image:John_kundla.jpgI have tagged Image:John_kundla.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 20:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] Replaceable fair use Image:JoWHiteBos.jpgThanks for uploading Image:JoWHiteBos.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 20:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fotolab.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Fotolab.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] Date changes in Kerry SibraaHi! With regards to this edit to Kerry Sibraa, the dates you changed both appear to have been correct previously. According to his ParlInfo biography, his first term as a Senator was "deemed to have begun 1.7.75", not June 30, and his second term began when he was "Appointed by the Governor-in-Council of New South Wales on 9.8.78", not 1987. I have changed those two dates back. --Stormie (talk) 22:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] USS Ronald Reagan editsMr. Solis, regarding your edits to USS Ronald Reagan (CVN-76), they appear to be moot. As Wikipedia:Dates#Autoformatting and linking points out, when dates are linked as those were, they will appear however the user has deemed when they set their preferences. For readers who are not users and thus don't have the benefit of setting a preferred way to view dates, the previous format was perfectly acceptable. I have not reverted your edits, but wanted to make you aware of this feature. Regards, Daysleeper47 (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] Replaceable fair use Image:LhudsonSTL2.jpgThanks for uploading Image:LhudsonSTL2.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 12:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] DatesNoticed you changed at date at Mwai Kibaki from [[15 November]] to [[November 15]]. Dates in wikilinks are automatically adjusted to display according to your own Wikipedia preferences on the Date and Time tab, so such changes don't need to be made to wikilinked dates in articles. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Autoformatting and linking--Jeffro77 (talk) 11:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Cmaxwellbos.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Cmaxwellbos.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 11:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC) [edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PetriePort.jpgThank you for uploading Image:PetriePort.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC) [edit] Tagalog WikipediaTagalog Wikipedia Campaign March 2008!
Tagalog Wikipedia is campaigning for your participation in writing, editing, assessing and translating articles! There are over 16,000 articles to view, read, review, edit, and expand, so please visit the Wikipedia Café and the WikiProject Philippines at Tagalog Wikipedia to help out! The campaign includes seeking your assistance in:
Or just anything you can do to help us just like what you are doing there at the English Wikipedia. Thank you in advance and regards, Tagalog Wikipedia CommunityFinally, Wikipedia is the 7th most visited site in the Philippines. Then why is it that the Tagalog Wikipedia, the Wikipedia in your own language remains unknown to most of the Filipinos? The mission of this campaign is to change that. Will you join us? [edit] Image:MarinWas.jpgI have tagged Image:MarinWas.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 23:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC) [edit] NBA WikiProject Newsletter
[edit] collectivisation > collectivizationWas there a discussion about these moves somewhere? To my understanding, you're supposed to keep articles in the same spelling form they started in (in this case British English). - TheMightyQuill (talk) 13:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC) [edit] RfD nomination of Ʒuˈɐ̃w̃ dɨ ˈbaʁuʃI have nominated the discussion page. Thank you. – ThatWikiGuy (talk|Co-kingship) 09:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at[edit] Wikilinking yearsRe this edit. Stand-alone years are usually not linked per Wikipedia:CONTEXT#Dates unless there is a very good reason for it. I thought you should know. Renata (talk) 16:34, 19 April 2008 (UTC) [edit] RfD nomination of ʤɔɹʤ ˈwɔːkəɹ bʊʃI have nominated the discussion page. Thank you. RichardΩ612 16:58, 20 April 2008 (UTC) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at[edit] 2007 censusWhile you're changing some of the data on the provinces, how about incorporating the existing 2000 data to give more encyclopedic information. For example:
--seav (talk) 10:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC) [edit] ThanksThanks for adding the reference of "Spanish variants" back to the Castilian Spanish page at the bottom. It was my first time adding a citation to a page, so I didn't realize that I had deleted something that was already there. Appreciate it. Kman543210 (talk) 10:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC) [edit] AsturiasTwo topics:
--85.181.106.91 (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC) [edit] New ProjectMyself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active. If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 07:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC) [edit] NBA WikiProject May Newsletter
[edit] Image:NixonLA.jpgI have tagged Image:NixonLA.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC) [edit] RəʊˈzeɪʃəA tag has been placed on Rəʊˈzeɪʃə, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template [edit] Please participate on Wikimedia Philippines discussionsCall for participation to Wikimedia Philippines
As one of the participants of Wikipedia Philippines, we are inviting you to participate in the discussion about the revised Articles of Incorporation. Feel free to comment and scrutinize the document. Some of the topics to be resolve include:
For your information, last May 5, 2008, Mr. Vincent Isles reserved the company name “WIKIMEDIA PHILIPPINES, INC.” from the Securities and Exchange Commission. The reservation will expire on August 3, 2008. The next steps will be the approval of the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws. We are fast-tracking the process that is why your inputs are vital and very much appreciated. Please visit the following links for your reference:
-Jojit (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC) [edit] UP Sigma RhoQuestion: Why did you remove the reference section? You did so 4 minutes after the latest revert by a soon-to-be-blocked editor. The references will be added back once an admin blocks User:Duck You for violating 3RR. You should undo your edit. Thanks. APK yada yada 07:05, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Poor JosephPutting the Related Section is biased, too, since the editor who had wrote the section don't have concrete evidence to the claim (other than newspaper articles, which is obviously very opinionated). having this as a reason, I think, it is just appropriate to delete it. Question: of all fraternities who has rumble histories, why Sigma Rho? Bitterness is a fatal sickness. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Duck You (talk • contribs) 07:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC) [edit] Response to User:Duck YouThis corrupt User:Duck You is very biased to his fraternity. His accusation that I am poor editor is not true and it is a deception and the true poor editor is User:Duck You.--Joseph Solis in Australia (talk) 07:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC) [edit] WP:HAU/OCHello . The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. With the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. bibliomaniac15 01:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WP:HAUSorry to bother you about this again, but you have yet to update your information at Highly Active Users. If you do not update your entry, it will be removed within 48 hours. Thanks. Useight (talk) 16:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC) [edit] WikiProject National Basketball Association June 2008 Newsletter
The message above has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot, a bot operated by Diligent Terrier. [edit] WP:HAUHello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight (talk) 22:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC) [edit] Copyvio[edit] Copyright problemsHello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Lopez-mateos.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/lopez-mateos.htm. As a copyright violation, Image:Lopez-mateos.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Lopez-mateos.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Esteban Zissou (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC) [edit] Font sizeHello. Would you please not go around changing the font size of references, as there are people who don't like them smaller.[1] Gimmetrow 07:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Well, I must say you have guts, making edits like [3] and [4] after this discussion. If you think all articles without exception should use smaller font for notes, then start a discussion to make that the policy. Until then, such edits make the font smaller for readers, which inhibits accessibility without a good reason, and are also "trivial" edits. Consider this a formal warning. Gimmetrow 01:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
As a person with less than perfect eyesight, I object to unnecessary changes to font sizes; reflist can be used when there is a long list of references, making it necessary. Otherwise, these changes are not necessary; please find a more productive way to spend your time on Wiki, and cease the personal attacks. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:45, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Hello again. Wiki editing tends to involve give and take. If it were up to me, all text would be the same size, since unlike a paper document, variable fonts gain us nothing. But others disagree, so we make compromises. I don't have a problem with [7] since it has quite a few notes. Could you consider leaving the notes be if the article already has a <references/> tag and 10 or fewer references? Gimmetrow 23:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC) [edit] WP:NPAI noticed the personal attack you lodged at Gimmtrow's talk page: I hate you. [8]
|