User talk:Joseph Solis in Australia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Joseph_Solis_in_Australia.

This is the user talk page for User:Joseph Solis in Australia, where you can send messages and comments to Joseph Solis in Australia.
Hello! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Wikisigbutton.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing!
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

[edit] My RfA

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which closed unsuccessfully with 25 support, 18 oppose, and 6 neutral. Thanks for the support and I'll look forward working with you. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 06:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:StarksnYK.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:StarksnYK.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Jerry_lucas_350.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jerry_lucas_350.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:John_kundla.jpg

I have tagged Image:John_kundla.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 20:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:JoWHiteBos.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:JoWHiteBos.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 20:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fotolab.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fotolab.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Date changes in Kerry Sibraa

Hi! With regards to this edit to Kerry Sibraa, the dates you changed both appear to have been correct previously. According to his ParlInfo biography, his first term as a Senator was "deemed to have begun 1.7.75", not June 30, and his second term began when he was "Appointed by the Governor-in-Council of New South Wales on 9.8.78", not 1987. I have changed those two dates back. --Stormie (talk) 22:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] USS Ronald Reagan edits

Mr. Solis, regarding your edits to USS Ronald Reagan (CVN-76), they appear to be moot. As Wikipedia:Dates#Autoformatting and linking points out, when dates are linked as those were, they will appear however the user has deemed when they set their preferences. For readers who are not users and thus don't have the benefit of setting a preferred way to view dates, the previous format was perfectly acceptable. I have not reverted your edits, but wanted to make you aware of this feature. Regards, Daysleeper47 (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:LhudsonSTL2.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:LhudsonSTL2.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 12:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dates

Noticed you changed at date at Mwai Kibaki from [[15 November]] to [[November 15]]. Dates in wikilinks are automatically adjusted to display according to your own Wikipedia preferences on the Date and Time tab, so such changes don't need to be made to wikilinked dates in articles. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Autoformatting and linking--Jeffro77 (talk) 11:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry. I did some checking, and mm/dd/yyyy is indeed the typical date format employed in Kenya, so your edit was better for those users who have not set their own date preference, as it will default to teh preferred local Kenyan setting of having the month first.--Jeffro77 (talk) 10:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Cmaxwellbos.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Cmaxwellbos.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 11:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PetriePort.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:PetriePort.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Tagalog Wikipedia

Tagalog Wikipedia Campaign March 2008!

Tagalog Wikipedia is campaigning for your participation in writing, editing, assessing and translating articles!
The purpose of this campaign is to expand and improve articles at Tagalog Wikipedia. Your participation will be highly appreciated by the community.

There are over 16,000 articles to view, read, review, edit, and expand, so please visit the Wikipedia Café and the WikiProject Philippines at Tagalog Wikipedia to help out!

The campaign includes seeking your assistance in:

Or just anything you can do to help us just like what you are doing there at the English Wikipedia.

Thank you in advance and regards, Tagalog Wikipedia Community

Finally, Wikipedia is the 7th most visited site in the Philippines. Then why is it that the Tagalog Wikipedia, the Wikipedia in your own language remains unknown to most of the Filipinos? The mission of this campaign is to change that. Will you join us?


[edit] Image:MarinWas.jpg

I have tagged Image:MarinWas.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 23:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] NBA WikiProject Newsletter

The NBA WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 1 • April 9, 2008 • Written by: Basketball110
News

Project and league news:

Features

Featured NBA articles of the week:

Project Collaboration
  • This feature isn't available yet. You will be notified when it is ready.
ArchivesNewsroom
If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from this list.
This newsletter was delivered by Basketball110 pick away....

[edit] collectivisation > collectivization

Was there a discussion about these moves somewhere? To my understanding, you're supposed to keep articles in the same spelling form they started in (in this case British English). - TheMightyQuill (talk) 13:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RfD nomination of Ʒuˈɐ̃w̃ dɨ ˈbaʁuʃ

I have nominated Ʒuˈɐ̃w̃ dɨ ˈbaʁuʃ (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. – ThatWikiGuy (talk|Co-kingship) 09:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikilinking years

Re this edit. Stand-alone years are usually not linked per Wikipedia:CONTEXT#Dates unless there is a very good reason for it. I thought you should know. Renata (talk) 16:34, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RfD nomination of ʤɔɹʤ ˈwɔːkəɹ bʊʃ

I have nominated ʤɔɹʤ ˈwɔːkəɹ bʊʃ (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. RichardΩ612 16:58, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 2007 census

While you're changing some of the data on the provinces, how about incorporating the existing 2000 data to give more encyclopedic information. For example:

"Based on the August 2007 census, Mandaue City has a total population of 318,575 people. This figure is up by 58,847 from 259,728 persons recorded in the May 2000 census, giving an annual growth rate of 2.96% during the 7-year period--significantly higher than the national average of 2.04%. If this growth rate were maintained, Mandaue would double its population in 24 years."

--seav (talk) 10:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for adding the reference of "Spanish variants" back to the Castilian Spanish page at the bottom. It was my first time adding a citation to a page, so I didn't realize that I had deleted something that was already there. Appreciate it. Kman543210 (talk) 10:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Asturias

Two topics:

  • Origin of the name Asturias, and the related "Principado de Asturias".
  • It can be useful to have access to the economic aid program of Asturias, it`s easy to note that my village is used to give hundreds of thousands euros in aid in America. This small townhall in Cebu can find this information quite useful.

--85.181.106.91 (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 07:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] NBA WikiProject May Newsletter

The NBA WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 2 • May 5, 2008 • Written by: Noble Story
News
Improved Content
Current Projects
Collaboration of the Month

Magic Johnson has been chosen to be our very first Collaboration of the Month article. Although this is article is already a Good Article, it still can be improved. The goal is to improve this article by the end of May so that it can be nominated for Featured Article status. In particular, free-use images should be found for the article, all Manual of Style guidelines should be followed, and a neutral point of view should be maintained throughout the article. If there is anything you can do to improve the article, then please help out.

ArchivesNewsroom
If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from this list.
This newsletter was delivered by Noble Story (talk)

[edit] Image:NixonLA.jpg

I have tagged Image:NixonLA.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rəʊˈzeɪʃə

A tag has been placed on Rəʊˈzeɪʃə, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. – ThatWikiGuy (talk) 09:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please participate on Wikimedia Philippines discussions

-Jojit (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] UP Sigma Rho

Question: Why did you remove the reference section? You did so 4 minutes after the latest revert by a soon-to-be-blocked editor. The references will be added back once an admin blocks User:Duck You for violating 3RR. You should undo your edit. Thanks. APK yada yada 07:05, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for correcting that. Cheers. APK yada yada 07:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Poor Joseph

Putting the Related Section is biased, too, since the editor who had wrote the section don't have concrete evidence to the claim (other than newspaper articles, which is obviously very opinionated). having this as a reason, I think, it is just appropriate to delete it.

Question: of all fraternities who has rumble histories, why Sigma Rho? Bitterness is a fatal sickness. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Duck You (talkcontribs) 07:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Response to User:Duck You

This corrupt User:Duck You is very biased to his fraternity. His accusation that I am poor editor is not true and it is a deception and the true poor editor is User:Duck You.--Joseph Solis in Australia (talk) 07:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WP:HAU/OC

Hello . The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. With the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. bibliomaniac15 01:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

You will also need to add [[Category:Wikipedians who use StatusBot]] to your userpage in order for SoxBot V to automatically update your online/offline status. If you do not added this text, you will always be listed as "offline" at HAU. Thanks. Useight (talk) 02:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WP:HAU

Sorry to bother you about this again, but you have yet to update your information at Highly Active Users. If you do not update your entry, it will be removed within 48 hours. Thanks. Useight (talk) 16:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject National Basketball Association June 2008 Newsletter

[edit] WP:HAU

Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight (talk) 22:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copyvio

[edit] Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Lopez-mateos.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/lopez-mateos.htm. As a copyright violation, Image:Lopez-mateos.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Lopez-mateos.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:Lopez-mateos.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:Lopez-mateos.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:Lopez-mateos.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Esteban Zissou (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Font size

Hello. Would you please not go around changing the font size of references, as there are people who don't like them smaller.[1] Gimmetrow 07:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

If four notes is "too long", then what in your opinion would not need changing? There is no need to use reflist for short lists of notes. Gimmetrow 07:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[2] That's the crux of the matter then. Please read the documentation of {{reflist}}, which says "Note that there is no consensus that small font size should always be used for all references". Gimmetrow 08:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
That's nice that you have a preference. Do you have to *vandalize* articles based on it? If you change every instance to reflist, you are acting as if it is policy, which it is not. Please do not change short lists of references to small font. The guideline used to say somewhere between 10-15 references was OK for small font. Gimmetrow 08:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, I must say you have guts, making edits like [3] and [4] after this discussion. If you think all articles without exception should use smaller font for notes, then start a discussion to make that the policy. Until then, such edits make the font smaller for readers, which inhibits accessibility without a good reason, and are also "trivial" edits. Consider this a formal warning. Gimmetrow 01:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[5] [6] Again, if you want all articles without exception to use small font for references, please start a discussion to make that policy. Otherwise, please stop arbitrarily changing the font size of notes on articles with few notes, or you may be blocked from editing. Gimmetrow 03:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

As a person with less than perfect eyesight, I object to unnecessary changes to font sizes; reflist can be used when there is a long list of references, making it necessary. Otherwise, these changes are not necessary; please find a more productive way to spend your time on Wiki, and cease the personal attacks. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:45, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello again. Wiki editing tends to involve give and take. If it were up to me, all text would be the same size, since unlike a paper document, variable fonts gain us nothing. But others disagree, so we make compromises. I don't have a problem with [7] since it has quite a few notes. Could you consider leaving the notes be if the article already has a <references/> tag and 10 or fewer references? Gimmetrow 23:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WP:NPA

I noticed the personal attack you lodged at Gimmtrow's talk page: I hate you. [8]

See Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy and comment on content, not on contributors. Continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:45, 8 June 2008 (UTC)