User:Jossi/Response

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] My response to Cade Metz article in The Register


[edit] Response to community feedback

[edit] Declaration of intent


[edit] Moving forward

  • On March 16, 2008 I requested arbitration asserting the need to assess the possiblity of imposing article probation and/or other restrictions, as well as to evaluate my behavior and the behaviors of all other involved editors and assess if any type of restrictions should be imposed: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Prem Rawat
  • After more than 290K of evidence, the Arbitration committee ruled that The evidence presented at this time has not disclosed a history of problematic editing, in terms of basic content policy, by Jossi. Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Prem_Rawat#Jossi
  • ArbCom described the consequences of a conflict of interest and stated that when a user with a conflict of interest makes contributions, the presence of the conflict is a good reason for close review of those contributions by the community, but the contributions are not necessarily problematic; scrutiny must always be with reference to content policy. The focus, as always, must be on the content. Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Prem_Rawat#Consequences_of_a_conflict_of_interest

In view of the the above findings and recommendations, I will continue to be aware of the need to behave in a circumspect manner on these articles, and welcome close scrutiny on my contributions moving forward. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 16:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)