Talk:Joshua Workman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Original: August 1, The original version of this Wikipedia page was a fluff piece of biography. While it was factually accurate, it did not tell the entire story of Joshua Workman's political career, leaving out huge chunks of information. Frankly the original article bothered me and offended my sense of decency. Wikipedia is not supposed to be a place where you advertise yourself. It is a place where knowledge is shared, so I did some digging and provided a more balanced view. The revised article is a more balanced and factual look at the story of Joshua Workman. What is now posted in the article is an acurate, fair portrayal of the Josh Workman saga.

Original: I would love to see the sentencing documents. Do you have a link?

Reply: You can obtain the via a freedom of info request from the US department of justice.

Original: Nice summary by the way.

Reply: Agreed.

Original: Actually with all our back and forth, I think we've got a pretty good page here. This seems to be a complete story and as I said way way back at the start of the day, I look forward to watching this story continue.

Reply: So Workman got a slap on the wrist from a nice Republican judge and plead his way down from 10 counts to two to keep his butt from doing hard time. I would hate for any college boy from Canada to do serious time in a South Carolina institution, even considering the seriousness of the charges. It was a white collar crime, and just because he plead to lesser charges didn't mean that he didn't lie. Its pretty clear that at some point he did.

Original: I think it was North Carolina. The judge was a man named Lacy Thornburg, who was a democrat - appointed by Clinton (http://www.fjc.gov/servlet/tGetInfo?jid=2384). The prosecutor was a democrat as well. I don't think there was any "deals" here along those lines, I think from what I can tell and reading the judges summary from the sentancing, the prosecutions case was weak and lacked some key facts.