Talk:Joseph Todaro, Sr.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
More information about this article... The following comments have been left for this page: A lot of stretches in here... (edit)

This is much better. It states the facts that can be verified and nothing more. Little Joe Shots certainly knew of a lot more but for the sake of being encyclopedic this is exactly what we need. Good work, Alexbonaro 04:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tone of Article

Once again the article has an informal tone. The worst example being "Centro Anni!" at the end of the article - a salutation of Todaro's successful career. The article must give up facts if they can not be cited - unfortunately it just doesn't seem like this article can have all of the information Little Joe knows about Todaro without getting sources for all those statements and receiving a major cleanup. Sorry Little Joe, you know far more than the rest of us but Wikipedia has these guidelines. Alexbonaro 23:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Agree with Alexbonaro

This article is really a PR piece for this guy Todaro plus it is way too long for a person of his importance.Rogermx 20:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] POV tag

This is about tag cleanup. As all of the tags are more than a year old, there is no current discussion relating to them, and there is a great deal of editing done since the tags were placed, or in some cases it's clear there is a consensus, they will be removed. This is not a judgement of content. If there is cause to re-tag, then that of course may be done, with the necessary posting of a discussion as to why, and what improvements could be made. Better yet, edit the article yourself with the improvements in place. This is only an effort to clean out old tags, and permit them to be updated with current issues if warranted.Jjdon (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)