User talk:Jorgengb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself.
- Read the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox.
- Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Good luck!
Jrdioko
P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Toglimi una curiosità, ma tu hai vissuto in Italia e/o hai parenti italiani, o ti sei imparato l'italiano e il lombardo per semplice interesse personale? Io al contrario (paradossalmente?) è da poco che mi interesso delle lingue romanze, fino a un annetto fa mi interessavano soprattutto le lingue germaniche, e infatti mi sono "imparato" (moooolto tra virgolette) lo svedese... Non so poi se il fatto che siano state fatte relativamente poche correzioni al mio articolo "Milanesiska" su sv.wiki debba rendermi fiero del mio svedese o semplicemente farmi pensare che nessuno avesse voglia di riscriverlo da capo ;-)
In quanto alle lingue romanze, invece... posso avere una tua opinione sull'evoluzione dal latino? Tutti dicono che le lingue romanze derivano dal latino volgare e non dal latino classico, e questo mi pare ovvio. Ma cosa è veramente questo latino volgare? Per esempio, secondo te nel latino parlato quando ancora c'era l'Impero si usava "ille" come articolo?
Secondo me sì: com'è possibile altrimenti che in tutte le lingue romanze (salvo, che io sappia, il rumeno e il sardo, che sono comunque lingue piuttosto marginali [nel senso di "marginal"]) si sia scelto "ille" come articolo?
In questo momento mi viene in mente solo la questione dell'articolo, ma ho pensato spesso che ci sono varie "coincidenze" strane tra le varie lingue romanze, che non riuscirei a spiegare se non con il fatto che il latino del tardo Impero dovesse già essere molto vicino alle lingue romanze di oggi.
Ovviamente puoi rispondermi in italiano in inglese, come preferisci... magari non in norvegese - anche se sarebbe un bell'esercizio, ma poi probabilmente dovrei chiederti di ritradurre tutto in inglese o in italiano ;-)
I can't give you a complete answer about CPU speed, since modern CPUs really have a lot of factors influencing speed, whose names, acronyms and meanings I prefer to remain ignorant about.
But, as a general picture, there is the CPU, which goes at a speed; there is the system bus (the PCI bus on most computers), which goes at a(nother) speed; and there is the memory bus, which goes (guess what) at another speed.
In the so called "old days", one clock really gave the computer speed: the CPU, memory, and often the "peripherals" (i.e. anything else) worked synchronously. Today, this model has become inefficient, and so the components have been uncoupled (the CPU works at a speed; the system bus and the memory bus work at two different speed, since memory transfers usually needs to be a lot faster).
Then there is something called "multipliers", which is simply circuits that multiply or divide a clock signal: 166 Mhz with an 8x multiplier is a complex way of saying 1328 Mhz (sometimes, though, two components work with the same clock but different multipliers, so it can be useful to know about the "base" clock speed).
With today's PCs, you'll hear the terms "clock speed", "FSB [Front Side Bus] speed" and "bus speed" (PCI / AGP / misc). I'm not 100% sure I'm telling you the right things, but "clock speed" is the CPU speed (base clock * multiplier), "FSB speed" is the memory bus speed (the base clock with no multiplier, if I recall correctly), and bus speed is bus speed, i.e. 66MHz for the PCI bus.
Look at the FSB article, at a quick glance it seems to give decent information. Also clock speed, which doesn't seem to be very detailed though.
Frieda ha modificato l'articolo sul milanese sulla Wikipedia italiana, eliminando ancora una volta i termini "lingua" e "varietà" per sostituirli con "dialetto". Ho scritto un paio di righe al riguardo sulla talkpage dell'articolo. Se ci vuoi dare un'occhiata... a me pare proprio che il modo in cui viene gestita la questione su it.wiki non abbia il minimo senso.
LjL 15:24, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] RfA for Kemmótar
The RfA you made for Kemmótar has not been properly formatted or accepted by the nominee. Please follow Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nominate carefully. I have removed the RfA from WP:RFA. --Durin 18:20, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] RfA for Kemmótar
The RfA you made for Kemmótar has not been properly formatted or accepted by the nominee. Please follow Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nominate carefully. I have removed the RfA from WP:RFA. --Durin 18:25, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] fi:Kenkänokka and מנעלן
Greetings,
I would like to compare the featured article fi:Kenkänokka with the corresponding Hebrew article he:מנעלן. Unfortunately I know no Finnish. Could you please have a look on both articles dealing with this wonderful bird, so we'd know what's missing in either article?
Thanks in advance, Lior 05:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Eastern Lombard related articles
I read on your UserPage that you are a linguist and that you have studied the Lombard language.
Well, I wrote the most part of the article on Eastern Lombard and Eastern Lombard grammar, but, as I'm not a linguist, I'm pretty sure that a real linguist would find a lot of imprecisions. I am just an Eastern Lombard mothertongue (from Brescia) and I tried to describe my language as accurately I could on the basis of my rather scarce knowledge of linguistics.
Would you be interested in taking a look to these articles and improve it giving them a more scientific cut?
Thank you in advance,
-- Ninonino 08:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
