User talk:Jonyungk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Archive span: Rachmaninov
Oh no, don't worry about that. Sure, Cui pisses me off, but in order to keep NPOV I suppose we should include some of his comments. I guess I could have sounded less curt there, but I didn't want to make an idiot of myself by soapboxing for thirty lines. :) — $PЯINGεrαgђ 00:53 22 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)
The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] your choral symphony article
Hi Jonyungk; I watch Symphony No. 8 (Mahler). You coincidentally brought a link to your article and I saw that you made the link. Therefore, I stumbled upon your newly-written article.
About your article, I noticed that not many articles link to yours; most likely it's because your article was in preliminary stages and you were about to add plenty, but I decided to add some links to your article, perhaps bringing choral symphony to more attention. I like your article very much; I actually did want to do something to elaborate on such symphonies; your article is just right. — Andy W. (talk/contrb.) 02:04, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Choral symphony
 |
On 16 May 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Choral symphony, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 18:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Rach work
Hey, I'd like to thank you for your work on Rach's article. You put in very high-quality work! ALTON .ıl 05:24, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Reply on Mahler and Shostakovich
Hi, the three pieces you mentioned all are not choral symphonies.
- I can't imagine Mahler's fourth as a choral symphony. It only has a soprano solo at the fourth movement, so it is almost entirely orchestral! (You can go check on other sources, but I am quite sure that all confirm that it is not a "choral symphony". Oxford may have been lazy.)
- Shostakovich's fourteenth is not a choral symphony for the same reasons. There is no choir.
- Yes, Das Lied von der Erde is not a choral symphony because there is no choir.
These symphonies can all be considered symphonies for orchestra and voice parts, but not as choral symphonies. I'll make a guess as to why Das Lied was left out of the choral symphony category: perhaps because it is unnumbered and some people just consider this work as a large-scale work for orchestra and voice parts. Mahler said it was a symphony, but there is still a bit of ambiguity. I myself am not too sure of the reason why Mahler wrote a Das Lied and a ninth symphony. (He was obsessed with the curse and perhaps when he wrote his ninth, which was actually the tenth, he skipped the curse. The curse would not affect him because he was already starting a tenth. Does this make sense?) I hope this clears it up a bit. Cheers. — Andy W. (talk/contrb.) 21:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:RockyPlays.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RockyPlays.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rach window in time.jpg}
Thank you for uploading Image:Rach window in time.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
-
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rach window in time.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Rach window in time.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
