User talk:Jondude11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 Clock tower pick
2 On the question of whether Jondude11 rockst
3 Campus pics
4 Further praise for Jondude11
5 WikiProject Airports
6 WikiProject Aviation proposal
7 Wikipedia New York Meet-Up
8 Notability of Eileen Whelley
9 Albany Air
10 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Commuter Airlines.jpg
11 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Potsdam Logo.jpg
12 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Crane Logo.jpg
13 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Catch Without Arms.jpg
14 Kathleen Deignan

[edit] Clock tower pick

Howdy, Jondude. I had left the P in the userbox pretty minimalist because I wanted to replace it with a decent pic of the clock tower, or a graphical representation thereof. As I'm sure the logo is copyrighted, I'm one of those alums that never gets to Potsdam, and I have never had any faith in Matt Keller to do anything right, do you suppose you might be able to snap one? --starX 16:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] On the question of whether Jondude11 rockst

Jondude11, thou rockst. Omphaloscope » talk 05:07, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Campus pics

Jondude- Looks like you've been working hard to get permission to use campus pictures. If you contact College Relations, they may be able to provide a good selection from which to choose. The problem with Matt's pics is that they suck. It's not your fault but they're so bad as to be worse than nothing.CrazyAboutCrane 20:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Further praise for Jondude11

Hear ye, hear ye... I hereby award this barnstar to Jondude11 for making a bazillion articles on local airports, train stations, and Yahwehknowswhat else. We Wikipedians salute your efforts!

Omphaloscope talk 04:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Airports

Greetings! I saw you joined WikiProject Airports and have created a handful of articles. This is very much appreciated! However, I noticed that the newly created articles don't have an airport infobox. You can find the template code for the infobox at WP:AIRPORTS/I. I've also listed them under airports requiring an infobox. If you get the chance, it'd be appreciated if you can add them, but if not, I'll make my best effort to get them added in the coming days. Should you have any questions about its usage, feel free to leave a message on my talk page or on that infobox talk page. thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 07:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry to keep bugging you. I noticed you're using the infobox on your new articles, and I couldn't be happier, not to mention that you're placing the project banner on the talk pages as well. You even added them to the new article subpage! Only one little thing still sticks in the back of my mind... you're not creating redirects. For example:

Southwest Minnesota Regional Airport (IATA: MML, ICAO: KMML)

Disambiguated at MML, redirected at KMML.

Hope that isn't too confusing. Keep up the awesome work! thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 18:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Also wanted to thank you for the work on creating airport articles. If you look at Category:United States airport stubs you will see that there is a template for US airports, {{US-airport-stub}} that you can use. Have fun. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi Jondude, I worked for 2 defunct airlines, more than happy to talk about them if you would like any information. Schase02

[edit] WikiProject Aviation proposal

There is currently a proposal to create an Aviation WikiProject, which would serve to clarify how all the aviation related projects relate, and help with interproject editing. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aircraft#Proposal_Recap for how the projects hierarchy. Part of the reorganization proposes that WikiProject Defunct Airlines become a task force of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Airlines (or perhaps the Aviation Project itself). For an idea of how task forces work, take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history. They have a number of task forces, listed here. As described by them, "task forces are informal groups of editors gathered for collaborative work on a particular topic within the field of military history; all project members are encouraged to participate in any that interest them." The benefit of such a system it that the sub-topics have all the resources of the overall project at their disposal. For instance, the Military history project banner, is placed on every military history page, and the related task forces are listed at the bottom of it. All military history related articles are thereby joined under one roof. I just happened to stumble upon your project, and had until now never realized it existed. By joining forces with another project you will benefit from increased exposure. If you have any ideas or comments, please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 02:19, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia New York Meet-Up

NEW YORK CITY MEET UP!!

Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC
--David Shankbone 19:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Eileen Whelley

A tag has been placed on Eileen Whelley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Videmus Omnia 22:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Albany Air

I've deleted this article, which you created, because it did not assert notability. Picaroon (t) 00:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Commuter Airlines.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Commuter Airlines.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:13, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Potsdam Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Potsdam Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Crane Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Crane Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Catch Without Arms.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Catch Without Arms.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kathleen Deignan

A tag has been placed on Kathleen Deignan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.