User talk:Jon24hours
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] ZX3
You said it yourself. "It's not official." Therefore mention of ZX3 is speculation. We don't deal with that here at WP.Satoryu (talk) 21:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- It's no speculation if you look at the Secret Ending in Advent. Mention of ZX3 was bound to appear when news starts popping up anyway. May as well start it now. Jon24hours (talk) 22:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Until we see an actual announcement of Rockman ZX 3, it's all speculation no matter how you look at it. Anything else is speculation and it won't be tolerated here. Please understand. Thank you. -Sukecchi (talk) 22:18, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Still don't really see the point, but meh. As fellow fans, I hope you look forward to it if/when it comes out! Jon24hours (talk) 22:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Until we see an actual announcement of Rockman ZX 3, it's all speculation no matter how you look at it. Anything else is speculation and it won't be tolerated here. Please understand. Thank you. -Sukecchi (talk) 22:18, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Self Research?
Read Wikipedia: Verifiability. Basically, you can claim you have the game and it does do what you claim it did, but you need to show strong proof of your claim so that people can verify that it's for real, and not just some baseless statement. It's for the sake of making Wikipedia an encyclopedia that has complete and veritable references. — Blue。 20:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, maybe there is no citation for such an information. You might try to find gaming magazines and websites out there to cite it, though. But if you're saying it's not an important information, it may not be necessary to write it. But I'm guessing it's not such an issue, so if you want to add it anyway, just make sure it's properly written. Cheers. — Blue。 21:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- The problem with Youtube videos in Wikipedia is quite the same: Verifiability. As is often pointed out, Wikipedia relies on verifiability, not truth. It's the policy. If no WP:RS cover it to verify (and we can't use a primary source such as a video of gameplay to do so), then we can't add it. Really sorry. — Blue。 21:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Pay attention to that policy. The film does NOT call him that, only unaffiliated listings, like the notoriously UNreliable IMDb, another movie aggregate site, and Marvel's promotional department, but not their movie credits guys, who did NOT put it at the end of the film. So sorry. ThuranX (talk) 00:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- The problem with Youtube videos in Wikipedia is quite the same: Verifiability. As is often pointed out, Wikipedia relies on verifiability, not truth. It's the policy. If no WP:RS cover it to verify (and we can't use a primary source such as a video of gameplay to do so), then we can't add it. Really sorry. — Blue。 21:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
