Talk:Jones calculus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Mathematics
Mathematics Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, which collaborates on articles related to mathematics.
Mathematics rating: Start Class Low Priority  Field: Mathematical physics
WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

Help with this template

Comments:

Do we know who Mr. Jones who invented this was? I ask because I suspect it was Isaac Newton's contemporary Sir William Jones and we might as well link to that if so. -- Paul Drye

I'm not sure. --Georg Muntingh

I very much doubt it. Try this:

Jones, R. C., ``New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical Systems I. Description and Discussion of the Calculus, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 31, 488-493 (1941)

I think we should expand this section to include elliptical jones vectors and how to get their magnitudes.

The polarizer with azimuth 0:

P(0) = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}

The rotation by \varphi:

R(\varphi) = \begin{pmatrix} \cos\varphi & -\sin\varphi \\ \sin\varphi & \cos\varphi \\ \end{pmatrix}

The polarizer with azimuth \varphi:

P(\varphi) = R(\varphi) P(0) R(-\varphi) = \begin{pmatrix} \cos^2\varphi & \cos\varphi\sin\varphi \\ \sin\varphi\cos\varphi & \sin^2\varphi \\ \end{pmatrix}

--HarpyHumming 22:01, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)

[edit] conflicting definitions for right- and left-hand circular

In a couple of places (e.g. "The Depolarisation of Electromagnetic Waves", Beckmann 1968) I've seen a conflicting definition of Jones vectors for right- and left-hand polarisations, where right circular is (1, i) - not the (1, -i) that is quoted here. In this Wiki article, I assume the wave propagates along +z, so E has components in x and y directions. Beckmann assumes the wave propagates along +x, so the corresponding E vectors are y and z (if we stick with a right-handed coordinate system!), thus a right circular wave screws clockwise if viewed in the direction of propagation. A right circular wave, by his definition, has Ey = 1 and Ez = +i, which correspond to Ex = 1 and Ey = +i in this article, hence my confusion. Any ideas?

Rob Granger. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.123.216.147 (talk) 10:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC).

There has been a lot of flipping of signs and changing of phase factors in this article. Someone should really go through, with reference to a text, and ensure that the entire article is using a single sign convention.--Srleffler (talk) 03:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)