Talk:Jonathan Yardley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is supported by the District of Columbia WikiProject.

This project provides a central approach to District of Columbia-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.

Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Edits and additions

What edits I did were light-handed, or so I hope. Wasn't sure footnoting to the Amason.com entries for the bios of Exley and Lardner served the entry best, so I eliminated the notes thereof. The books themselves are in the bibiography section, with their respective ISBN numbers. AndreasKQ 03:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC) I think this article reads like a public relations press release. Compare it with that of Michael Dirda, another writer for the Wash. Post Book World. It's more modest even though Dirda is also a Pulitzer Prize winner -- and a better writer, in my opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Star-lists (talkcontribs) 02:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)