Talk:Jon Sudbø
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
@User:Pomegranite: Please give me some reason for why you reverted my edit. The article was overwikified, listed the names of lots of co-authors that did not do any good and contained the word 'hoax' which is not a word used when talking about scientific fraud. I again applied the same changes, please discuss why you would want them reverted... Cpt. Morgan 22:35, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Norway's scientific reputation could also be damaged by the affair... ? How can that be based on one single individual? User:sofus 14.July 2006
[edit] Criminal?
I see that the article has been added to Category:Norwegian criminals. What criteria are needed to be regarded as a criminal? While his fraud is proven, does that finding of the disciplinary committee constitute a conviction in the legal sense, and is this required to be put in the category? Tamino 21:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- I removed the categorization. I also removed other categorizations. They indeed need to be better sourced - fnielsen 20:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Allowed to work as a dentist again
Norwegian newspapers mention that he has been given a limited authorization to work as a dentist again, and as now he works in Seljord. If you understand Norwegian, check out [1] and [2]. He still can't work as a medical doctor. Delta Tango • Talk 09:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)