Jonathan's Law

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jonathan's Law, a New York statute co-sponsored by Harvey Weisenberg signed into law in May, 2007, by governor Elliot Spitzer, entitles parents and legal guardians to access to all child abuse investigation files and medical history records.[1]

The legislative measure is intended to hold residential mental health facilities accountable by requiring notification of guardians in cases of ill treatment, and requires written reports of ensuing investigations. Jonathan's Law was sponsored by Assemblyman Harvey Weisenberg (DLong Beach) and State Sen. Thomas Morahan (RNew City); Mike and Lisa Carey, the parents of Jonathan Carey, promoted Jonathan's law.

Contents

[edit] Background

The State of New York's Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities prevented the family of Jonathan Carey from accessing records relating to their son, who had been diagnosed with autism. Jonathan attended the private Anderson School in Dutchess County in 2004. The Anderson School specializes in the education of children on the autism spectrum. Being nonverbal, Jonathan was unable to tell his parents what had happened to him.

[edit] Legal effects

[edit] Records access

Gives parents and guardians of developmentally-disabled people who live in government facilities access to records concerning abuse allegations involving their loved ones. Records must be produced within three weeks after an investigation is closed.

[edit] Phone notification

Mandates telephone notification, within 24 hours of an incident, to parents or guardians, followed by a written report within ten days.

[edit] Meetings

Requires facility directors to meet with parents and/or guardians to discuss reported incidents.

[edit] Fines

Increases fines for noncompliance to $1,000 per day, and up to $15,000 per violation.

[edit] Privacy concerns

OMRDD officials cautioned the New York legislature about passing Jonathan’s Law without sufficient consideration, citing privacy concerns, adding that rushing their decision to could be detrimental, asserting that whistleblowers will be less likely to come forward if their accusations become public.

[edit] Perspective of advocates

According to advocates supporting Jonathan's Law, everyone deserves safety and quality medical care. They have argues that parents of individuals deemed unable to protect themselves must be allowed reasonable access to transparent records, thereby enabling families to ensure quality of care for their loved ones.

[edit] External links