Talk:Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Military technology and engineering task force

Contents 1 FAS 2 Outdated? 3 Redundant paras 4 What are SCI levels?

[edit] FAS

Looks like the meat of this article came from the fas.org website. Isn't this considered copyvio???

Supersquid 14:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Outdated?

This seems like it's outdated as well.

[edit] Redundant paras

The first three paragraphs were copies of the subsequent paras., sans markup, and with one additional opening sentence. Perhaps this was done in order to dispel copyvio claims? I don't know, and won't be investigating it; however, from a style point of view the article is better off now. --Arkeides 19:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What are SCI levels?

The article currently refers to SCI levels, without any explanation of what they are. So, what are SCI levels? What is SCI?

I came to this article because a passage in the 2006 decision memo that resulted in Guantanamo captive Sultan Sari Sayel Al Anazi's repatriation stated^[1]

The Board reviewed and considered the associated SCI material for this case and considered it relevant but redundant. This information is being forwarded separately via JWICS to the Director, OARDEC.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 17:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Sensitive Compartmented Information there ya go on what SCI is. JDBlues (talk) 20:01, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Ah... Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 03:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)