User talk:JohnnyAlbert10/Archive 5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WP:NJSCR newsletter 4
 The New Jersey State and County Route Newsletter |
|
After a three-month hiatus, the fourth issue of the WP:NJSCR newsletter is out, by me, Mitchazenia. The foruth issue of the WP:NJSCR newsletter celebrates the passing of New Jersey Route 18 for Good Article Status. 18 is only the third NJ-based road to reach that rank with Interstate 295 (Delaware-New Jersey) and Pulaski Skyway being the other 2. |
|
|
|
|
- Want to help on the next newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it transcluded next time? – It's all here.Mi tch 19:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
PASH newsletter - Issue 001
 The Pennsylvania State Highways Newsletter |
|
The first issue of the WP:PASH newsletter recognizes all of the good articles the project has produced. |
|
To-do list
|
|
|
- Want to help on the next newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it transcluded next time? – It's all here.JA10Talk • Contribs 00:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 25 | 18 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
NY 52
First, I'm flattered, despite all the accolades road articles I've worked on have gotten, that you want to help develop this one to GA. Since I live a block away from it (I can move the chair I'm sitting in right now, twist my head a bit, look out the window and see this bridge, and walk to it and back in less than a minute), and it figures in some of my current commutes, it would make me very happy to do so.
What problems exactly in the lead are you referring to? What's the "strict way of writing them without using them as the subject"? Do you mean subject of the sentence or the article? I think you mean the former ... I notice you've added the "NY" to a couple of second refs; I guess that's fine although I remember in one recent PA route FAC (was it yours? I can't remember which one) someone from outside the roads projects complained about the repetitive overuse of that designation, seeming to feel as I do that in most instances the route number alone usually suffices on second references and the repetitive use of "Route X" tires the reader after a while (that's why I mix it up in my route descriptions ... one of the open secrets of effective writing is knowing how to find different ways to refer to the same thing when you have to repeatedly ... no reporter works for long without being able to do this). Please let me know — I'd be delighted to help improve this, although finding good refs for the history section is something I keep putting off because it means going through maps and historical archives from five different counties, and I just haven't had the time for something that I can't put too high on my real-life priority list. Daniel Case 02:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
OK. Knock yourself out with route description sourcing (although I've always felt that highway route descriptions are pretty easy to verify, at least the self-evident aspects, by simply having someone else drive down it, with photos where possible to document any of the more extraordinary claims that can be so documented) and should probably be treated as requiring no footnotes. (I mean, most maps aren't going to tell you, or be able to tell you, that Route X widens to four lanes with a middle turn lane a half-mile east of the Podunk Municipal Airport, and there's only so many pictures you can put in an article and only so many things you can document with the pictures). But anything you can do along those lines helps in an FAC, I know.
As for history, I may be in a better position to source this locally. Very little in the road history department can be sourced online outside of roadfan sites (which we have trouble always getting accepted as reliable sources, I know). I will have to write to or visit libraries, public historians and NYSDOT regions 8 and 9 to see what they can share as far as archival material. But there should be a lot. I do know, from what I know and can document of local history, about the Newburgh-Ellenville Turnpike that built what became that stretch of 52 back in 1851 (and, like all the other old turnpikes, didn't make money, allowing the state to retake an improved road not long afterwards). The person you were having so much trouble with in the PA 145 nom had a point, even though I don't think they quite got it across the right way: You can't limit your research for articles to online sources. Especially on something like this. You would probably have been able to find what they were looking for in old newspaper clippings about the construction of the expressway (the downside of so much current and recent material being available online is that very little pre-late 1990s newspaper articles are, outside of major papers like the Times and Washington Post which can afford to digitize and store them. For New Coke, the first article I ever got to GA, I have relied on at least three books which aren't available online, and a few old newspaper and magazine articles that are only on microfilm.
So, I can probably get sources for the history. But it will take some legwork on my end. Daniel Case 03:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- We'll have to wait until this dispute is done, then we can cleanup the article. -- JA10 Talk • Contribs 22:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 26 | 25 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
PA 39
I've looked at the 1911 map. I haven't found LR 39 if it exists. However, I have found that LR 140 overlapped part of what became PA 39 between Linglestown and Piketown Road, which became the decommissioned SR 39/896 concurrency as seen in the intersections list. This is certainly noteworthy, I just don't know where to put it in the article, since 140 existed before PA 39 or PA 896 existed. I would think that it could be mentioned under the context of the background of PA 39 before it was established. I'll let you know if I find LR 39. --Son (formerly myselfalso) 04:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've found LR 39. It ran between Bedford and McConnellsburg, which, from what it looks like today, is US 30. --Son (formerly myselfalso) 04:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
WP:PASH newsletter - Issue 2
  The Pennsylvania State Highways Newsletter |
||||||||||||
| Issue 2 | 1 July 2007 | About the Newsletter | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. -- JA10 Talk • Contribs 02:13, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 27 | 2 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pennsylvania Route 222
The article Pennsylvania Route 222 you nominated as a good article has passed 
, see Talk:Pennsylvania Route 222 for eventual comments about the article. Well done!
--Hdt83 Chat 19:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
USRD Newsletter - Issue 10
The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter |
||||||
| Volume 1, Issue 10 | 7 July 2007 | About the Newsletter | ||||
|
||||||
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —VshBot (t • c) 04:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Wikimedia Pennsylvania
Hello there!
I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:
- Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
- Join our mailing list
- Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com
Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 03:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 28 | 9 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
July 2007 GAC backlog elimination drive
A new elimination drive of the backlog at Wikipedia:Good article candidates will take place from the month of July through August 12, 2007. There are currently about 130 articles that need to be reviewed right now. If you are interested in helping with the drive, then please visit Wikipedia:Good article candidates backlog elimination drive and record the articles that you have reviewed. Awards will be given based on the number of reviews completed. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the drive's talk page. Please help to eradicate the backlog to cut down on the waiting time for articles to be reviewed.
You have received this message either due to your membership with WikiProject: Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. --Nehrams2020 23:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
WikipediA Savy
I noticed how you're like really well verse in how this site operates. Since, I'm fairly new to this stuff...I was wondering if you could give me some useful links as to where I could find Wikipedia Tags, and a more comprehensive CheatSheet for code...like info boxes, etc
By tags I mean like "Speedy Deletetion" etc...
I'm working on a wikipage right now Misa Campo and I need to edit some thing so I want to put a tag on it to basically say, editting needed so people don't delete or touch it til I get back to edit it...Basically..an Under Construction thing... --Huper Phuff talk 17:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not that experienced with tags, I just write articles and clean them. You might be looking for WP:AAU. -- JA10 Talk • Contribs 18:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
I was also wondering how you installed that bar at the top that says you're online...and more specifically how you created a sandbox :) --Huper Phuff talk 18:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
{| class="messagebox standard" style=background:{{{bgcol|#F8EABA}}}
|- style=text-align:center
| (text goes here)
|}
There you go. Where it saids (text goes here) write your message. -- JA10 Talk • Contribs 18:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Home Run Derby
I noticed you reverted this revision to the Home Run Derby article where I expanded the "most wins by team" table to include every team that participated and how many contestants they've sent to the competition. There was no explanation given why it was reverted; I noticed you also reverted the three vandalism edits that succeeded my edit and I wondered if mine just got caught up by mistake. Whether it was that or a legitimate reason, I'd appreciate some feedback, as I personally think this is a useful addition (as well as, perhaps, the number of home runs hit by each team in the derby). Highway99 19:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
