User talk:JohnLease

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please don't add non-notable people to notable people sections. Nyttend (talk) 16:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

I repeat: do not add nonnotable people; continuing so to do will be considered disruption, which ultimately us a blockable offense. Moreover, do not edit my userpage. Nyttend (talk) 20:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, check the Cherokee, Iowa discussion page Nyttend, I've put my thoughts on this on there. Non-notable to you isn't non-notable to everyone. If you want to waste someone's time, try someone else for a change. JohnLease (talk) 13:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

This is your second warning: stop adding non-notable people to pages. You cannot prove notability for someone without an article, unless it's someone automatically notable such as a legislator or professional athlete. You have provided no reliable sources for this guy being notable (YouTube isn't reliable for Wikipedia's purposes), and from what you write I take it that his band hasn't even released a CD. Please read WP:N again: this guy fails Wikipedia's definition of notability. Nyttend (talk) 14:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

This is your first warning: stop editing a page you clearly know nothing about. JohnLease (talk) 14:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

And this is your second warning: stop editing a page you clearly know nothing about, and furthermore, have refused to educate yourself with. JohnLease (talk) 14:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

And I've now trumped you, this is your THIRD warning to quit editing pages you clearly know nothing about. Now, am I clear? Your response, as from "A few good men", should be "Crystal, Sir". JohnLease (talk) 14:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

I have to agree with Nyttend on this; you have yet to prove any sort of notability for Bradley Roberson (any sources that reference him, like a newspaper article or something), so he doesn't merit inclusion on the page. Veinor (talk to me) 14:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

This is your second warning: stop adding this person to this page. You have now disrupted this page six times; continuing so to do is certainly disruption, and if you continue enough times, you may be blocked. Nyttend (talk) 15:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, the original 'reason' was lack of references. References have been provided. This is your fourth warning. JohnLease (talk) 19:08, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Those references are not reliable sources; anybody can get a Music Nation account. Notability for bands is composed of 12 criteria, and Red Racer doesn't seem to meet any of them, at least according to the references that you have given. Veinor (talk to me) 19:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

If anyone can get them, then get one and prove it. Shifting goalposts is a Bush trait that you seem to share. JohnLease (talk) 12:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. Simply providing extra references doesn't show that the guy is notable, especially with pages such as YouTube. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia's Cherokee article in this way, you will be blocked from editing. Nyttend (talk) 12:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Look Nyttend, I guarantee you I know more about Cherokee, Iowa than you do. Now, I've asked you to quit doing this multiple times. I was unaware that you were in fact infallible. I met your argument, and you had nada to say after that, really. So knock it off, for the fifth time.

Here's my proof that anybody can get a music nation profile: [1]. And knowledge of Cherokee is not what's relevant here, knowledge of Wikipedia guidelines is, and the external link guidelines state that any sort of personal site doesn't constitute a reliable source. Veinor (talk to me) 15:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Cherokee, Iowa.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nyttend (talk) 19:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Cherokee, Iowa. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Nyttend (talk) 19:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Cherokee, Iowa. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nyttend (talk) 02:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

Nyttend (talk) 13:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "ridiculous, and petty. Nyttend has made it his passion to undo any edit I make, and yet finds it unacceptable when I make corrections on his. His juvenile behavior is not what Wikipedia is all about"

Decline reason: "Care to explain your edits such as this one? MaxSem(Han shot first!) 19:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "That would be payment in kind. Care to comment on the vast number of juvenile actions taken BY Nyttend?"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

It's kinda strange, Wikipedia is filled with a LOT of douchebags. C'mon normal people, we need to overwhelm them with our normalness. JohnLease (talk) 22:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)