User:John Nevard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Wikipedia Ads	file info – show another – #104

138 links to a child sex abuse advocacy site on Wikipedia? Could that possibly be too many?

[1] Another amazing reference source.

check for copyvios from [2] at [3]

rather inappropriately sympathetic tone here

I'd like to see an article on Universal Express [4] and their 'controversial' former CEO Richard Altomare. And some good work on Biovail.[5][6][7] Part of the story of the heroes who dealt with Solv-Ex is here. More here. Winstar Communications.

Ambo chasers: John O'Quinn. Christian, Smith & Jewell. Heard, Robins, Cloud, Lubel & Greenwood

Propagandists: RGM Communications

Distorters: Phil Erlanger, Ray Dirks

Companies which just happen to have gone downhill: Pet Quarters (PDEN), Sedona (SDNA), Hyperdynamics Corporation (HDY)

Resource: [8] [9]

A section on stock parking?

I've taken a more charitable view of these companies and those that endure lately. I'm better off when fools and their money are parted.

That said, the world'd be a lot better of if some of them really pulled corporate Waco's.

a single purpose editor on an article targetted by the larouchites on wikipedia? naaaah.

"criminals ... manipulating social media to forestall the day of social epiphany" - Patrick Byrne on Wikipedia editors.

Fremont Emancipation

Waypoint Biomedical

Loungewear

Circumcellions- only actual source seems to have very little to do with article

interesting notes

I'd like to see an article, or at least a section in the Public Information Research article, on Daniel Brandt. If the French can do it, we can. The Poles have crafted an excellent article too. Of course, because Daniel Brandt is Public Information Research (reference: the minor scandal sheet The Nation), there is a paucity of information. But this doesn't mean bold editors should be prevented from authoring a good bit of supportable text of appropriate length.

Of course, having an article on him could mean he gets arrested for his 60's activism. So clearly we should just not have an article on him. It's only reasonable.

And what about David Brandt? I hear he's making quite the splash lately. :)

NXIVM

Peggy Sue Hilt, Matthew Mancuso. Notable?

It interests me that people see the war to keep pedophile trolls off Wikipedia in terms of "a faction that believes that the majority point of view can be substituted for the neutral point of view" and "a faction that believes that NPOV means both covering points of view equitably and disclosing our affiliations and our biases.". Reminds me of "To a communist, everyone looks like..."

Needs disambiguation

Removals need to be checked

Terrible misquotes that are to- tally taken out of context. By today's poor persecuted Socrates. (oh, how I wish)

"The Internet may be acting as a catalyst, both in molestation and pornography traffic," he says. "Pedophiles can convince themselves they are not evil, just politically incorrect."[10]

[11]

needs a cleanup

sourcing should be easy with chops like that

Undies 500