Talk:John de Menteith
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Evidence neutrality
The Evidence section uses many subjective and bias-inferential adjectives (e.g., "impossible", "vacillating", "turncoat, "abundant") that could be considered weasel terms. There are also style issues such as starting sentences improperly with "it" and much needless verbosity. The main problem is that the Evidence section reads like fictional paragraphs from a novel. The writing should be objectively and studiously presented. "Just the facts, ma'am!" Adraeus 02:03, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
- This article carries some serious factual mistakes, to the extent that it is better deleted than kept in its current state. Fix a few bits just now. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 06:19, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fause mulitple meanings?
The article says John was refered to as "Fause Menteith" and then explains it in two different paragraphs as meaning False Mentieth or Menteith the treacherous. Does anyone know which is correct?69.141.37.100 (talk) 22:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)