Talk:John W. Johnston

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	John W. Johnston is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 2, 2006 Good article nominee Listed August 21, 2006 Peer review Reviewed October 19, 2006 Featured article candidate Promoted Current Status: Featured article

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal FA This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] This article is supported by the Politics and government work group. More information about this article... This article has had a peer review by the Biography WikiProject, which has now been archived. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. FA This article has been rated as FA-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) John W. Johnston is part of WikiProject U.S. Congress, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the United States Congress. FA This article has been rated as FA-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. ??? This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", and "Event."

The following user(s) are actively contributing to this article and may be able to help with questions about verification and sources: Plange (talk · contribs) This in no way implies article ownership; all editors are encouraged to contribute.

[edit] Good article

Very nice article. Very thorough, especially in describing the key opoints of his more career defining involvements. Very well referenced and good use of inline references. Short, but informative. Great job to all the editors!--Esprit15d 18:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)