Talk:John Trobaugh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.

An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

	This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.

[edit] Biography assessment rating comment

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 17:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Why?"

Why? Artsojourner 17:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Why what? -- Hoary 06:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Need for radical editing

The article isn't badly written, but it's followed by a couple of things that are formatted as lists but that look like series of chunks awaiting digestion. I suggest that somebody knowledgable about this photographer should digest the chunks and -- oh dear, let's not take this metaphor too far down the alimentary canal -- integrate what's valuable within the main text of the article. -- Hoary 06:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm still digesting some of his information. There seems to be more than I bargained for. I will try to work it it more. Thanks Hoary! Artsojourner 16:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)