Talk:John Sopinka
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
Contents |
[edit] Biography assessment rating comment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 20:47, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Timeline
I deleted the passage that said his family moved to Hamilton in 1955. It must have been earlier than that, if he "completed secondary school" there, since he was born in 1933. The SCC web site says it was 1941, which makes a bit more sense, although if he moved there at the age of 7 or 8, how is it that he "completed" secondary school in Hamilton? Wouldn't all of his secondary school education have been there? --Mathew5000 11:38, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] courthouse
I rewrote the last paragraph about the courthouse named for Sopinka in downtown Hamilton. I used two web pages as sources: [1] [2]. A couple of things are unclear to me. First, is the correct name of the courthouse "John Sopinka Court House" or "John Sopinka Courthouse"? Both have hits on Google. Also, the building itself was originally named "Dominion Public Building"; I assume that name is now superseded. But I'm not certain. Also, the two web pages have a discrepancy in the estimate of how much was spent; one says $64-million, the other says $77-million. Also, the way I have phrased it says "In 1999, a new courthouse in downtown Hamilton was named in his honour." I wonder if this needs to be re-worded because does it suggest that the building itself is new, or just that it is new qua courthouse? The idea that needs to be conveyed is that when they converted the building into a courthouse, it was named for Sopinka. --Mathew5000 11:48, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] cause of death
Article says he died of a "rare blood disease" but what specifically was the name of the disease? Was it ever ascertained that he contracted the disease while on vacation in Ukraine, or had he had it for a while and just coincidentally started showing symptoms after visiting Ukraine? --Mathew5000 11:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] no prior judicial experience
I took out the phrasing that it is a "tradition" to have one appointment from private practice. It might become a tradition, but I think it's too early to declare it a tradition yet. Also I re-worded that part to make it clear that he was not actually the first Supreme Court judge to be appointed without having been a judge previously. For example, Robert Taschereau. Also I'm pretty sure Ronald Martland was appointed to the SCC directly from private practice in 1958. There were probably several others as well over the history of the SCC.
Also, this article says that Sopinka was asked to join the Ontario Court of Appeal in the mid-1980s, but he declined, and told the Justice Minister that he might take a different view if he were offered a spot on the SCC. Perhaps that could be added in the article although I don't know how reliable the source is. It refers back to an interview in the October 8, 1995 issue of The Ukrainian Weekly. --Mathew5000 12:15, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- The article Roland Ritchie says expressly that he was appointed (in 1958) to the SCC with no prior judicial experience. The articles on Robert Taschereau and Ronald Martland don't mention any prior judicial expression, but also don't say there was none. --Mathew5000 20:59, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] What position did he play?
In football, of course. Thanks, heqs 02:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:John Sopinka.jpg
Image:John Sopinka.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
