Talk:John Marshall
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is there anything that I contribute to Wikipedia that's right? -- Zoe
- Please don't take offense Zoe - we all edit articles and fix each other's mistakes. The trouble was that the image is more than 206 px wide. --mav
-
- As a pure technical note, I see no reason (even from a performance or load point of view) for including an explicit width of a diversion. It does not help at the Wikipedia end, nor at the client (which needs to find the diversion height anyway). So I would recommend simply leaving out the explicit width. -- Egil 06:20 Apr 29, 2003 (UTC)
-
-
- Unfortunately some pre Mac OS X-based browsers do not wrap text below images when an explicit width isn't added (resulting in a justified image with a column of white space below it the same width as the image. That said, I still don't add the specification myself becasue I'm lazy and think those Mac people should upgrade to Mac OS X or buy a PC with Linux on it. ;) --mav
-
-
-
-
- Or just switch to Mozilla? There is a Mozilla version for just about everything. Tannin
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Omniweb under Mac OS X does the same thing [1], which is why I go around changing them when I see them (I have Photoshop open all the time, so it's easy for me to do). (I'm not switching to Mozilla, either, if it can't handle nested tables; see Talk:Yttrium. ;-) Hephaestos
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- There is nothing wrong with Moz - the nested table doesn't look right because an image should be in the middle of it to prop-up the different parts. See Lithium for an example of one of these nested tables with an image in it. --mav
-
-
-
-
I note this page is linked to Casualties of the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks: City of New York where a firefighter with this name was killed. He should be mentioned.
I would do it myself but am too depressed from reading the names of the dead. Paul, in Saudi
Someone (preferably someone who nows mroe than I do) should also deal with the British mariner John Marshall, whom the Marshall Islands are named for... that article links here, confusingly. -FZ 13:56, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Several quasi-humorous remarks are inserted in this article; maybe someone adept in Wikipedia can revert those changes? 213.10.183.26 20:35, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Queued images
[edit] Intermarried
John Marshall's tombstone reads "Intermarried with Mary Willis Ambler ". Does anyone know how "intermarried" is different from "married"?Vincent 01:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
No, but all i know is that they are a little different if you have any more questions ask me at www.bubn8tor@yahoo.com ok and if you wat to know look on they internet dictionary.♣
[edit] GA Re-Review and In-line citations
Note: This article has a very small number of in-line citations for an article of its size and currently would not pass criteria 2b.
Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. Agne 23:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
John Marshall was responsible for Johnson v. Mcintosh, a ruling which profoundly altered US relations with the Native Americans under the principles of the "Discovery Doctrine" and a ruling which has set the precedent for government's relationships with indigenous peoples the world over. The result of Johnson v. Mcintosh is still set in US law today. I'm suprised there is no mention of this, does anyone know why? I will add something myself if I get the time 81.86.44.208 14:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 14:02, 5th January 2007 (GMT)
It seems like there is an error in the dates for Marshall's time as Secretary of State. Did it end on March 4, 1801 as the article asserts? If so, then he was Secretary of State and Chef Justice simultaneously.
I am distantly related to John Marshall, an interesting point is that he is rellated, quiet directly, to James Marshall. James Marshall discovered gold at "Suter's Mill" witch led to the 1849 gold rush in California.
-thebigjimmer
§hhhh
>_^ Change Christmas Day to December 25th please. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.81.211.208 (talk) 20:24, August 23, 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Political Philosophy
Wouldn't it be a good idea to include his actual political philosophy as a seperate section (if it's there) or at all? [[Kidalana 23:44, 21 October 2007 (UTC)]]
[edit] Timmy, Lassie, and Frank Heugnonaut
Why didn't anyone notice that they were screwing around with the name over the picture?Ericl 16:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
libby repasky is the coolest person ever
courtney carey is sweet —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.23.40.23 (talk) 12:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC)