From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
WikiProject Children's literature (Rated Start-Class) |
|
This article is part of WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to children's and young adult literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project.
|
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
Tasks you can do:
WikiProject Children's Literature Open Tasks
|
|
Update: Author Biography articles and write about new books written for children
Expand: articles in the Demonata series by Darren Shan
Create new articles relating to Children's Literature
Add this template ( {{Children'sLiteratureWikiProject}} ) to the talk pages of articles relating to Children's Literature.
Expand and Edit Portal:Children and Young Adult Literature
Cooperate with Wikipedians belonged to similar WikiProjects
Discuss matters involving Children's literature on this wikiproject's talk page
Cleanup the Philip Ardagh article.
|
|
|
[edit] Quote?
Do we really need that quote that already appears on the 'Looking for Alaska' page, and only quotes someone's blog? IF that's the case, can we quote dozens of positive reviews as well? Czolgolz 13:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it does quote the author himself, and this is the author's page, and it is not a review, and it is significant in light of the ALA award for the book for kids as young as 12, but let's see what others say. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling 15:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nerdfighters and Worldsuck
I think the mention of these should either be expanded or deleted, as it doesn't explain anything. Andral 02:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- I expanded it, I think it's pretty good now. Jax
[edit] Hank Green
What happened to the Hank Green page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wistungsten (talk • contribs) 08:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- This is not the page to discuss Hank Green Gang14 (talk) 10:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Brotherhood 2.0 - Unnecessary section?
There seems to be a totally useless and trivial section within the Brotherhood 2.0 subsection devoted to a specific song performed by one of the brothers. Deletion is hereby proposed. 68.57.109.141 (talk) 02:41, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- That actually is a useless part of the section that has been deleted Gang14 (talk) 02:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- That came from another article that was being coatracked to support Hank Green. SirFozzie (talk) 03:31, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Nerdfighters an actuall page?
Does anyone else think that Nerdfighter deserves its own page? --Stotheb2010 (talk) 15:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Perhaps it could be integrated into this article somehow, under Brotherhood 2.0 section. TheTwoRoads (talk) 15:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- That would be very rejected by many people I love John and nerdfighters but sorry guys but I'd say try for its own page Gang14 (talk) 03:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)