Talk:John Fedko

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

	John Fedko is part of WikiProject Pittsburgh, which is building a comprehensive guide to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. To participate, you can edit the attached article, join or discuss the project. Editors are currently needed to tag Pittsburgh-related articles with {{pghproj}}.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 March 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

[edit] Ok it's marked for deletion but NO one leaves a comment as to why??

I don't see why you would delete this, I am looking for a reason and I can't find any, I vote to keep it, or at least delete Bob Costas and Michael Irving along with this one ;) Hholt01 23:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Poorly written, waste of time

This article is not only poorly written but also a big waste of time. Wikipedia is supposed to serve as an encyclopedia, not a popularity contest for the best known sportscaster in Pittsburgh from the late 90s. If it is important enough to discuss Fedko's popularity, then do so on the WPXI page.

But to give a page to him with very little information on it is in poor taste to the community of Wikipedia.

Important and real journalists don't even have Wiki pages. Why don't we just start making Wiki pages for our neighbors and pet fish, too? Geez. --Write On 1983 05:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Now that it's staying...

Now that the world of Wikipedia has decided to allow the John Fedko article to stay, how about making it better. Quite frankly, I think the writing on it is terrible and the information is weak, at best. --Write On 1983 18:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC)