Talk:John Edensor Littlewood
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||||||
 |
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group. | ||||||
|
|||||||
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mathematics rating: | Start Class | Mid Priority | Field: Mathematicians | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Contents |
[edit] comments
"He was the Senior Wrangler in the Mathematical Tripos, beating out even G.H. Hardy." Is this correct? I had the impression that Hardy was on staff at the time. --Simen rustad 07:36, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, Hardy was some eight years older than Littlewood. In his Miscellany Littlewood says that getting full marks on Analysis was his first contact with "a startled Hardy" who had just joined the staff of Trinity College. OTOH, Littlewood was bracketed equal with Mercer.
I'm adding a note about his collaboration with Mary Cartwright. Richard Pinch 18:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Um...
In Hardy's own words: "John's a cool cat but he's one crazy mofo."
Is there any way to verify this? I've looked around a bit but I haven't found any mention of the quote, and it doesn't quite sound like something a mathematician would say. Amphy 03:17, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:JELittlewood.jpg
Image:JELittlewood.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Littlewood as pseudonym for Hardy
Steven G. Krantz, in Mathematical Apocrypha (MAA, 2002) pp. 44-45 reports that the statement that Littlewood was a pseudonym Hardy used on his lesser papers is told in many versions and is attributed to Edmund Landau and to Norbert Wiener. He doesn't give any citations, though. --Uncia (talk) 14:38, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- It is then a documented rumour. It is quite funny but unless it had some effect beyond making people giggle its not really encycopedic.Billlion (talk) 17:29, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- True. The anecdote is really a joke about the person (whoever it was) who thought Littlewood was a pseudonym, not an insight on Littlewood. The previous anecdote, relayed by Bohr, is not quite as bad. It says that Hardy and Littlewood were highly regarded, although we don't know by whom. In its present form it is "some people say", that is WP:WEASEL. So it might be salvaged if we knew who said it. --Uncia (talk) 00:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Three great English mathematicians: Hardy, Littlewood, Hardy-Littlewood
This story is not helpful as stated, since (1) there is no source (2) we don't know whose opinion it is. If anyone has more information please provide it, both in this article and in G. H. Hardy where the same story is told. Robert Kanigel in The Man Who Knew Infinity quotes the story on p. 165 and in the footnotes says "This has become a commonplace in mathematical circles", which means it may be unverifiable. Thanks. --Uncia (talk) 13:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
