From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
John Cranley is part of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
Suggested article edit guidelines:
- To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification.
- After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
|
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
- If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
|
This page is about an active politician who is running for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy.
Because of this, this article is at risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
|
[edit] Point of view
Mfields1 has added a paragraph detailing Cranley's recent campaign against Chabot, but it reads just like a campaign site. We can perhaps mention specific complaints about corporate welfare and so on, but we shouldn't state those particular terms as fact, since that'd violate our Neutral point of view policy. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 19:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Minh Nguyễn - please compare the selected versions. I did not add the paragraph. I did add the information from the current news about John Cranley's decision to run for Congress. The information has external links to news articles. Look at earlier versions. The original paragraph was added a long time ago. Mfields1 01:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Okay, sorry. [1] got messed up a little when you added a line. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 09:19, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
An unreferenced tag was added to Catholic Background because this line needs a source "Some analysts have indicated that his opponent's success is due to the conservative sentiment within the district." --KiltedMile 06:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
I am not in this Ohio district and have no interest in the election, but I noticed the tag that was added. I included a publication date since the article referenced a publication of 6 years ago. Often Wikipedia articles about political candidates are vandalized and slant the information one way or the other depending on the editor's politics. Where possible references should be current material. Mfields1 23:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)