Talk:John Carpenter (game show contestant)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article was nominated for deletion on September 15, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on April 13, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

1 Link
2 Play by play
3 Previous winner?
4 What's the meaning of this "sentence"? please correct or take out. Thanks.
5 "keep" for all future votes on deletion
6 The actual wording of the questions:

[edit] Link

There's a link to a video of when he wins, and it's labeled, "the video when he win." I love how some people can't talk English. I'm fixing it.-Babylon pride 23:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Just because you can speak and write English well doesn't mean people around the world should be the same. And just because people don't write English as well doesn't mean they should be discouraged from contributing in Wikipedia. --210.9.15.113 08:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Certainly not. But they'd be well advised to contribute to Wikipedias in a language they're fluent in. I'm sure French wikipedians would not appreciate it if I BabelFished a few paragraphs and posted them. Also, more often than not, broken English is the result of a native speaker being lazy, also something Wikipedia doesn't need. Much like you writing in grammatically incorrect English from an IP located in Australia, or the original commenter's wonderfully ironic "can't talk English". While the Wikipedia concept welcomes and even requires the participation of laymen, elementary command of the language being used on their part shouldn't be too much to ask. Unigolyn 10:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Different people, different points of view... to me, the only relevant criteria to know if someone should contribute to Wikipedia is whether his contributions globally improve the encyclopedia or not, and not what his level of English is. The person who found "the video when he win" made a nice improvement to the article, and we are better off than if he had not made it. Someone else, such as Babylon pride, then comes and corrects the grammar. It's the whole point of a collaborative encyclopedia, isn't it ? In this case, the linked video was broadcast on a French channel, so we would not have known about it on the English wikipedia except for the French speaker who made a grammatical mistake. We need this kind of people, even if their English is broken. Schutz 12:34, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Play by play

Where can I find information about that episode. A "play by play" of his questions?

http://pl.youtube.com/watch?v=OhmsXtqJQBU - that's the link to the part 1 of his game, next parts are responses. 85.89.170.12 (talk) 18:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Previous winner?

I don't understand the inclusion of this phrase: "While only one other contestant had ever answered all questions correctly even with the use of three lifelines..." Did the previous contestant 'answer' correctly but then not give it as their final answer? If so, this should be clarified as it is currently confusing.

[edit] What's the meaning of this "sentence"? please correct or take out. Thanks.

[...] But if the lyrics, which appears to be a hymn to a broken-hearted loner, is about John or not is not to be said but the bands singer Leo have repeatedly told the story about him and his win at gigs.