Talk:John Brunt V.C. (public house)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 2007 November 24. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article is supported by WikiProject England, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to articles relating to England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article associated with this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
This article is within the scope of the Kent WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the county of Kent in South East England.
If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.)
Low This article is on a subject of low-importance for Kent-related articles.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


[edit] Pictures

There's a picture of the old sign here which we probably can't use, so I'll head out as soon as we get a nice day and take some photos of the pub and its sign. We can probably use the sign picture for the John Henry Cound Brunt article, too! -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 20:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

The sign was lost after the renaming debacle when the pub was sold by Whitbread, so I think the image I've used is permissable, as it's irreplacable. -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 16:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Manual of style issues

Please change the article to comply with the MOS. Thanks -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 18:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Maybe I'm being thick, but could you explain exactly how the article fails to comply? -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 08:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Not the only pub?

I've removed the unsourced addition about it NOT being the only pub named after a VC winner. If this is true (it could well be true) this still needs referencing. Apparantly the source used says that it is the only pub, and this will have to stand until it can be proved otherwise. Mjroots (talk) 07:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)