Talk:John Bourn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

user "bluegrouper" has removed the controversy section that was added. If you look at what "bluegrouper" has contributed to wikipedia you find he has solely removed criticism from the National audit office article and from the article of its head (this article).

Um, no. If you'd bothered to look at the history you will see that I actually added the original criticisms, see [1]. --Bluegrouper 18:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry my mistake. "bluegrouper" has solely removed criticism contributed to the National audit office article and the article of its head (this article). I have added an encyclopedic "criticism section". I feel this information has a right to be on here. please correct any errors I have made Chendy 00:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I have condensed justification for travel as it is needlessly long and comes across as overly defensive.Chendy 11:34, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

It seems Bluegrouper solely edits this and the NAO page. Bluegrouper consistantly alters sourced statements on this page, with either discussion or by providing sources. Bluegrouper merely changes/distorts statements while leaving the original sourcing, providing the illusion that the Bluegrouper statements are sourced. I feel there may be some Wikipedia:Vanity_guidelines issues. Chendy 12:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

please provide a source for "On 22 of these, he was accompanied by his wife Ardita, as befits a public official of his standing." - It is assumption that is not obvious to me and so needs to be sourced.Chendy (talk) 11:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)