Talk:John Ackland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NEW! Task force on State of Origin NEW!
Want to help improve Rugby league articles? Join WikiProject Rugby league

	The article on John Ackland is supported by the WikiProject on Rugby League, which is to improve the quality and coverage of rugby league related articles on Wikipedia. If you wish this article to be re-assessed, go to our Assessment Department and add it to the list. If you wish this article to be peer-reviewed, go to our Peer Review Department and add it to the list. If you rated this article you may want to leave some comments here on how the article can be improved.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	John Ackland was automatically assessed as stub because it uses a stub template If you agree with this, edit the page and remove the auto=yes parameter.
	John Ackland was automatically assessed as having no infobox by a bot. If you agree with this, edit the page and remove the autotemplate=yes parameter.
	This article on John Ackland needs the infobox {{Infobox rugby league biography}}.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Portal	John Ackland is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)