Talk:Johan Oscar Smith

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Military work group.
Photo request It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.
This article is part of WikiProject Norway, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Norway. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Christianity This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Start This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.


[edit] Rating

I cleaned this article up and would self-rate it as a class B biography. Interested in another assessment.Wikisuperfixer 14:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know about these classes. (A link to how the assessment works would have helped.) But the article was IMO in pretty serious need of a NPOV edit and a less devout tone, which I have supplied. It was too much about Smith's Friends, too. Of course Smith's founding of SF was what makes him notable, but the information about the movement in this article still needs to be angled in a biographic way, not lose sight of Smith himself and go off at a tangent about Smith's Friends today. In my immodest opinion, I've made the article a good deal more encyclopedic. Bishonen | talk 21:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC).
P.S. Now I've found the link to the rating project above. Too, too much reading, can't face it, sorry. Bishonen | talk 21:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC).