Talk:Jog Falls

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.

[edit] Merge

Yes merger is required. --Bhadani 15:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Created separate page for the town -- P.K.Niyogi 10:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Height

Please understand that Jog is the higest untired water fall in Asia. Water fall database does not rank untired water falls. It also cosiders falls that flow like a stream from the hill. Thus saying Jog falls is 8th heighest is incorrect and does unjustice to its beauty.

Is't Jog heighest plunge falls in Asia? ~rAGU (talk)

[edit] What is real?

First of all, I had never heard of these falls, and came here only by chance because I had been at User:Sarvagnya's user page. They are beautiful! Now I have to say some things about the article, only some of which I can fix.

The informal tone lent to the article by the use of the 2nd person in the Cause for Concern section makes it difficult for me to ascertain the genuineness of what is written. When the article says, If you happen to ask any of the local people what happened to the falls, they would tell you that the authorities open the dam only during weekends, when there are a lot of tourists to view it, I cannot tell if the locals would tell you this because it is actually true, or if it is because they are playing a prank on the tourists. I know that, here in the US, there are many rivers that are "turned on and off" for the benefit of tourists (often to allow for rafting), and I have no reason to doubt that this sort of thing would be done in other countries. My point is merely that, if this is true, then the article needs to abandon the use of the 2nd person (which is bad form, anyway) and write, Local people frequently need to explain to tourists who wonder why the falls are so small that the river's flow is blocked except on weekends, when authorities release it for the benefit of tourists, or something like that. So could somebody clear this up? Many thanks. Unschool 05:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

I changed the "Cause for Concern" section to "Change in Flow". I saw no reason why the information in that section constituted a "Cause for Concern". Unschool 05:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)