User talk:Joffeloff
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Joffeloff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! TomStar81 21:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Stridsbat90h.jpg
Please see the image description page.
[edit] Edit summary
Skinnyweed 15:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- I'll ask the same question. What's the point of adding that to people's user pages without saying what article you're referring to? Joffeloff 15:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- This one. Because of the sheer amount of edit summary tags I'm adding, adding any more information would take lots more time. Skinnyweed 15:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- "sheer amount", do wonder why you are adding so very many. Took a look and you have added a LOT of these tags to peoples' talk pages. Why?! It is not essential compulsary policy that people have to follow, merely a "good idea". So sometimes I'll do that, and sometimes I won't... Mathmo 11:58, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
Are you an editor of Wikipedia? If so, can you please lock the Blackwater page from editing? My name continues to appear there as a founder (Jamie Smith) of Blackwater Security and is followed by "...left under allegations of resume fraud..." This is not true and is slanderous and libel. I have gone in and deleted my name and the material three times but it continues to be replaced. Please remove it and lock it to protect against this bias. Thank you.
[edit] Maybe you would be interested in
This, this, this, and this. It's just a short listing of the hoops that are having to be jumped though for Operational Names in articles. Regards, ← ΣcoPhreek Is UselessNostalgia→ 17:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- There's a big difference between using the operation names as article names and mentioning that this is what the U.S. called the operations. Joffeloff 17:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- Again, I agree. However, the user starting all this is also removing them from articles, stating that they are propaganda. They are justifying that based on the moving of Articles from the operational name to the Non-operational name. ← ΣcoPhreek Is UselessNostalgia→ 17:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- I have seen atleast one instance where the operational name was used for the article treating the involvement of the party using the operational name, and an article named 'war/conflict/etc in Wherever' as an umbrella article for the involvement of all sides. Isn't that perfectly neutral and good? I don't see the big deal. Joffeloff 17:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- One would think it was, but just for an example in the article we started in [1] this is going on in dozens of articles by the same person, and no one is willing to stop them (there is even an admin supporting), we do have an ArbCom case going but I'm not sure what will happen to that. ← ΣcoPhreek Is UselessNostalgia→ 17:22, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stateless people
I see you have readded [2] to Basque people the Category:Stateless people. I was amazed at it the first time too. Why do basque people fall into the stateless people? They do have a legal nationality: they're Spanish. They don't form an state, as Spain is not a federal country, but they are a Autonomous community. Can you explain? Platonides 21:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- They do not have their own nation state even though they belong to a federal state. In this way various ethnic groups like the native americans, native australians and new zealanders can be added to that category aswell.
- I'm not suggesting that they're being 'oppressed' or any BS like that, but you can't say that they don't have their own nation state of a Basque character. --Joffeloff 21:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- Also, the category originally pertained to stateless individuals but has since been used very often to describe groups who don't have their own nation-state. I understand the confusion, because there is a current debate over what that category should represent. --Joffeloff 21:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Iran Iraq War
I don't see what is it that you are mad about, i reverted CJK's several edits, i am sorry if i accidently reverted your edit among them. --Spahbod ☼ 19:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] POV
If an article overly focuses on minor issues from weak sources, that is POV and should be removed. Just wanted to let you know since you were confused on the issue. 75.3.52.176 03:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Nansenoslo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nansenoslo.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Navy templates
Are you wanting to know about navy or ship templates? I have only worked with ships and classes, not the navy pages really, so I don't know about templates used on those pages. If you want info on the ship templates I've made, let me know which kind you are working with and I'll help out. Josh 03:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- I was thinking about the seemingly simple templates with a navy ensign and the Navy's name, like:
- Template:Navy USA
- The 'source' for this template reads navy|flagnavy|USA. Trying to simply change this to navy|flagnavy|ISR or something else doesn't work out of the box, and (to me atleast) there is no telltale way to do this, and no guide anywhere.
- I'm sorry for bothering you if I'm speaking to the wrong person, but an overweight of the templates were created by you so I figured you'd be the one to ask. --Joffeloff 03:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ah yes, these... I built them on the model of the country referencing templates that are used ( United States; Israel; etc.) so I do agree there is a bit of depth to them that it took my a while to figure out, but when I create a new one I basically follow the following procedure:
- Create the template file, I'll create Template:Navy ISR for the example.
- Template:Navy ISR should read {{navy|flagnavy|ISR}}.
- Preview Template:Navy ISR and you will see three redlink templates, though two links are to the same template.
- Create Template:Navy flag alias ISR to read Naval Ensign of Israel.svg, which is the image name of their naval ensign.
- Create Template:Navy alias ISR to read Israeli Sea Corps, which is the official name and the name of the article to reference.
- Save Template:Navy ISR and you will see it look as intended: Template:Navy ISR
- Let me know if you have any questions, I'd be more than willing to help out. Like I said, I tried to base it on the country flag templates, but they are slightly different.Josh 00:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ah yes, these... I built them on the model of the country referencing templates that are used ( United States; Israel; etc.) so I do agree there is a bit of depth to them that it took my a while to figure out, but when I create a new one I basically follow the following procedure:
-
-
- Many thanks! I think I've got the hang of it now. --Joffeloff 00:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] License tagging for Image:Vardskip framan stor.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vardskip framan stor.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:NSM NH90.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NSM NH90.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:10, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your edits
Are all marked as minor. Review Help:Minor edit if you get the chance. You have added siginificant discussion to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Hornbeck as a minor edit, however, the edit was not minor. Regards, Navou banter 17:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's a habit stemming from noobie days when I only dared correcting spelling errors. I'll try to think about that box before ticking it. :) --Joffeloff 17:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks bud... minor edits don't show up in my watch list (unless I set them too) and I want to know if discussion is added... BTW its beginning to look like I might have made a mistake nominating that page, we'll see after a few hours. Happy editing. Regards, Navou banter 17:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for catching that
Thanks for catching that obvious error in the History of gays in the Holocaust article. I am in charge of the featured articles at the LGBT portal, and wanted to use that article this week, but it didn't have a lead. I was typing quickly, and have a bad case of the flu, so that mistake went right by me in proofreading. It's fixed, now. Thanks again. Jeffpw 03:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- That's the one thing that made me notice it, such a strange error making it onto a portal. --Joffeloff 03:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Solstad-logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Solstad-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:48, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Road safety camera
I have moved the article back to Road safety camera which is a simpler and descriptive title. If you are concerned over NPOV issues then please set up a move request at WP:RM so that there can be a full discussion. Your suggested title of 'Road rule enforcement camera' is not logical - the cameras detect not enforce and there is no such legal instrument as a 'road rule. If you want a new title then you might wish to consider 'Road offences detection camera' which, though clumsy, at least has the virtue of accuracy. BlueValour 17:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Having thought about things I have a new suggestion - 'Vehicle detection camera' which I quite like - if it finds favour with you I shall put it forward at WP:RM. BlueValour 17:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, anything but 'road safety camera' as a very large minority feels these cameras do anything but contribute to road safety. --Joffeloff 18:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, please share your views at Talk:Road safety camera#Requested move. BlueValour 22:19, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, anything but 'road safety camera' as a very large minority feels these cameras do anything but contribute to road safety. --Joffeloff 18:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Yj87lg.jpg
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Yj87lg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's 22:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Commercial use of Image:International inspections pennant.gif
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:International inspections pennant.gif, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:International inspections pennant.gif is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:International inspections pennant.gif itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Nansenoslo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Nansenoslo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Lara❤Love 14:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nansenoslo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Nansenoslo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:58, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] January 2008
[edit] Nasjonal sikkerhetsmyndighet
A tag has been placed on Nasjonal sikkerhetsmyndighet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Redfarmer (talk) 01:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:NoCGV_Barentshav_CGI.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NoCGV_Barentshav_CGI.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 11:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)