Talk:Joffrey Tower

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Joffrey Tower has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
May 5, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

Some sources say that floors 9-32 will be residential condominiums.[1] Others say floors 5-32 will be condominiums.[2]

It is unclear whether floors 5-8 will be condominiums, parking or commercial property.

Resolved.

See article.

[edit] GA Passed

Nice, clear and to the point. There's the slight problem of stability, but I figure as long as you keep on top of info it'll be alright. Automated peer review suggestions are:

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?] Y Done 21:29, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?] Y Done 21:36, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Avoid including galleries in articles, as per Wikipedia:Galleries. Common solutions to this problem include moving the gallery to a separate page, like Gallery of Joffrey Tower.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 291 foot, use 291 foot, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 291 foot.[?] Y Done 21:29, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.[?] Y Done 21:45, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DoomsDay349 17:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC)