Talk:Joe's Garage
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit ยท refresh)
|
|
 |
The Arbitration Committee has placed all Scientology-related articles on probation (see relevant arbitration case). Editors making disruptive edits may be banned by an administrator from this and related articles, or other reasonably related pages. |
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ. |
|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments | |
Contents |
[edit] Synopsis Needs Improvement
The tone is a bit too flippant, the POV is too in-universe, and for someone who does not know the album, I think this synopsis is hard to follow and not, ultimately, informative. Also, I think it could be slightly longer and more detailed.69.178.122.114 (talk) 23:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Arbitrary section header
yeah, i added on a bunch of references but their not showing up. yes i am a stupid newbie, can someone show me what to do? User:The Guilty Undertaker
- First of all, the Barry Miles biography is not considered a good source of information. The book is widely considered to be a piece of shit by real Zappa fans. Secondly, you managed to delete the last part of the page somehow. Don't do that. (Ibaranoff24 17:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC))
- I read it and found it perfectly fine. The Wikipedia standard is verifiability. The source is not invalid. 69.178.122.114 (talk) 19:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Why are acts Two and Three summed up in two sentences?
[edit] Lyrics
It seems to me perfectly reasonable to put external links to lyrics on an album article. -- joe. 07:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Joe's Garage booklet.jpg
Image:Joe's Garage booklet.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
