User talk:JodyB
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(UTC)
Hello and welcome!
If you post to my talk page, I will reply exclusively here. If I posted recently to your talk page, I will read responses exclusively there.
Please make sure and sign your message with ~~~~
This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify) |
The current date and time is 13 June 2008 T 19:37 UTC.
Contents |
[edit] Article deletion
Hi JodyB,
A while ago I put up the article Eppo Doeve for speedy deletion. I thought it met the only criteria needed for G7 ("the page's only substantial content was added by its author"), criteria which allows for other authors and does not say notability comes into play. Could you point me to where Wikipedia's guidelines show that an article can meet all of the qualifications needed for deletion, be requested for deletion, and still be kept? Gnomestar (talk) 22:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you from Horologium
[edit] Centre for Ultrahigh Bandwidth Devices for Optical Systems
I added some references to Centre for Ultrahigh Bandwidth Devices for Optical Systems. Please see my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for Ultrahigh Bandwidth Devices for Optical Systems. --Eastmain (talk) 01:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Repeated vandalism by anon users
Just thought I'd let you know that there are anonymous users using their IP's vandalising the page Battle of Hubbardton, deleting my source as a British / German victory and citing it as an American tactical victory. (Trip Johnson (talk) 18:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC))
- Some anon user is now at the same thing on the Battle of White Plains. Just thought it best to let you know before I usually get the warning for vandalism. (Trip Johnson (talk) 10:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC))
-
- I have been out of pocket this weekend but at the moment both seem to be ok with you as the last editor. Is the White Plains article sourced? I know Hubbardton is. I may have missed something. -JodyB talk 10:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Aye, they are both sourced. (Trip Johnson (talk) 19:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC))
-
-
-
-
- And now, Red4Tribe (surprisingly) is at the same thing on the Battle of Hubbardton's page. He made a ridiculous claim that he "could not see my sources" when they were clearly defined, and somehow brought up the conclusion that "both my sources are unreliable" without any effort to discuss it. You could consider this my reporting him if you wish, because I'm getting sick of him. (Trip Johnson (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC))
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- What that really means is sources that agree with his opinion are reliable, while those that disagree are unreliable. (Trip Johnson (talk) 18:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC))
-
-
-
-
-
(outdent) Please notice at the top of the page that I am busy in real life. I am re-evaluating certain commitments and am focusing on core responsibilities. Please go to WP:MEDCAB and seek assistance there for ongoing mediation or assistance. I wish the best to you all. You are working on a part of the Wikipedia that is really important and deserves proper sourcing. Just don't let your passion overcome your better judgments. -JodyB talk 11:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WBOSITG's RfA
[edit] My RfA
Hi JodyB; I wanted to say thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again, PeterSymonds | talk 21:48, 13 May 2008 (UTC)