Talk:Jock McKeen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

	Complementary and Alternative Medicine Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject on Alternative Medicine. Please visit the project page for more details, or ask questions on talk.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.

I am a first-time editor in Wikipedia.

I object to the two pages I am editing being removed while I am developing them.

Bennet Wong and Jock McKeen (the two pages in question) should not be removed. They are significant figures who deserve to be represented here.

The problem is that I don't know how to make the changes necessary to keep the pages (Jock McKeen and Bennet Wong) alive.

Please send me specific suggestions about how to prevent the deletion of the pages, and I'll get to the editing lickety split.

Thanks

William Meyer 19:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Check out the Wikipedia page WP:NOTE for a good start. Also read WP:PROD for steps you can take to contest the deletion. Thomas Dzubin _Talk 19:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks ... I'll research this .... I am removing the tag now that this discussion has begun. I want to get this right! William Meyer 21:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

UPDATE FEB 22, 2007 McKeen page updated with Career Path and References. The reference section needs more work ... to embed the references in the text. It is a beginning. William Meyer 01:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sourcing to Reliable, independent third-parties

I have completed the basic text and the references now. I believe this satisfies the Wikipedia standards for "reliable independent third parties." I will continue to add references and refine the text. William Meyer 16:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)